Re: encoding.ser.castor

2003-08-05 Thread Anne Thomas Manes
ugust 04, 2003 3:19 PM Subject: Re: encoding.ser.castor Thanks for clarifyin the types of message styles supported in AXIS.   It seems then there are three different message styles for doc/literal:   - Wrapped - Document - Message   It seems that Wrapped and Document

RE: encoding.ser.castor

2003-08-05 Thread Hansen, Richard
Too bad the wsdl2java ant task does not support the noWrapped param (at least in v1.1). -Original Message-From: Anne Thomas Manes [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]Sent: Monday, August 04, 2003 8:15 PMTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: Re: encoding.ser.castor As I think I mentioned

Re: encoding.ser.castor

2003-08-04 Thread Tony Opatha
face (client uses call object)Anne- Original Message -From: "David Kocher" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "Anne Thomas Manes" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>Cc: "James Cowan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>Sent: Monday, August 04, 2003 11:20 AMSubject: Re

Re: encoding.ser.castor

2003-08-04 Thread Anne Thomas Manes
vers a DOM element) - doesn't produce an interface (client uses call object) Anne - Original Message - From: "David Kocher" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "Anne Thomas Manes" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: "James Cowan" <[EMAI

Re: encoding.ser.castor

2003-08-04 Thread David Kocher
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Cc: "James Cowan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Monday, August 04, 2003 6:49 AM > Subject: Re: encoding.ser.castor > > > On Thursday 31 July 2003 18:47, James Cowan wrote: > > > I am interested in this as well. I use the Castor

Re: encoding.ser.castor

2003-08-04 Thread Anne Thomas Manes
; To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: "James Cowan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Monday, August 04, 2003 6:49 AM Subject: Re: encoding.ser.castor > On Thursday 31 July 2003 18:47, James Cowan wrote: > > I am interested in this as well. I use the Castor xsd compiler a lot - it

Re: encoding.ser.castor

2003-08-04 Thread David Kocher
de.html#DataMapping Someone out there who can explain what I am missing that my typeMapping below doesn't work? Thanks a lot - David > > James > > - Original Message - > From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Thursday, Ju

Re: encoding.ser.castor

2003-08-04 Thread David Kocher
Sorry for the late response. I don't think I should change the encoding. After all I still want to send the data over the wire in soap encoding. But first trying castor unmarshalling the data by its own might be a better aproach. -David On Thursday 31 July 2003 17:05, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >

Re: encoding.ser.castor

2003-07-31 Thread steve . s . maring
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> .uk> cc: 07/31/2003 12:47 Subjec

Re: encoding.ser.castor

2003-07-31 Thread James Cowan
- From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, July 31, 2003 4:05 PM Subject: Re: encoding.ser.castor > David, > > I'm about to do this myself, with the exception of using my own set of > CastorSerializer classes so that it will look for my c

Re: encoding.ser.castor

2003-07-31 Thread steve . s . maring
David, I'm about to do this myself, with the exception of using my own set of CastorSerializer classes so that it will look for my custom mapping. So I'm very interested in this topic. I wonder if the encodingStyle should be somthing else? Have you confirmed that the (un)marshalling process is