thank you both!
Glen Daniels wrote:
(note to self - read all the mail before responding. :) Thanks Sameer!)
-Original Message-
From: Sameer Bombatkar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, June 04, 2003 3:16 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: returning an array of javabeans
(note to self - read all the mail before responding. :) Thanks Sameer!)
> -Original Message-
> From: Sameer Bombatkar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, June 04, 2003 3:16 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: returning an array of javabeans
>
>
&
SOAP-encoded arrays are automatically mapped, so you should be fine with just the bean
class.
--Glen
> -Original Message-
> From: Joel Realubit [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, June 04, 2003 3:10 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: returning an array of javabeans
>
>
>
Standard beanmapping entry for your javabean class should work fine.
--Sameer.
From: Joel Realubit <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: returning an array of javabeans
Date: Wed, 04 Jun 2003 15:10:07 +0800
MIME-Version: 1.0
Re
