RE: sample code: using java.util.Date instead of java.util.Calendar

2003-06-04 Thread Stu Halloway \(DevelopMentor\)
<< From the Schema specification, "dateTime represents a specific instant of time". Although a timezone-like offset from UTC is allowed in the representation of a dataTime value, as I understand it this is not part of the dateTime *value* - in other words, it's just a convenience that is meant to

Re: sample code: using java.util.Date instead of java.util.Calendar

2003-06-04 Thread Dennis Sosnoski
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Dennis Sosnoski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> escreveu: From the Schema specification, "dateTime represents a specific instant of time". Although a timezone-like offset from UTC is allowed in the representation of a dataTime value, as I understand it this is not part of the dateTime

Re: sample code: using java.util.Date instead of java.util.Calendar

2003-06-04 Thread jaccoud
>Dennis Sosnoski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> escreveu: > From the Schema specification, "dateTime represents a specific instant >of time". Although a timezone-like offset from UTC is allowed in the >representation of a dataTime value, as I understand it this is not part >of the dateTime *value* - in other

Re: sample code: using java.util.Date instead of java.util.Calendar

2003-06-03 Thread Dennis Sosnoski
From the Schema specification, "dateTime represents a specific instant of time". Although a timezone-like offset from UTC is allowed in the representation of a dataTime value, as I understand it this is not part of the dateTime *value* - in other words, it's just a convenience that is meant to