sage-
From: Elliot Metsger [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, August 18, 2004 4:00 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: WSDL2Java overloading functions
Anand et. al,
Can you offer your perspective on the interoperability of rpc/lit in the
future? Dosen't the WS-I Basic Profile 1
sage-
From: Elliot Metsger [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, August 18, 2004 4:00 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: WSDL2Java overloading functions
Anand et. al,
Can you offer your perspective on the interoperability of rpc/lit in the
future? Dosen't the WS-I Basic Profile 1
Anand:
Many thanks for the summary!
Anand Natrajan wrote:
doc/lit of course decouples the request/response from a procedural model on
the server side, which is nice and fine philosophically, but practically,
doesn't affect me much. I suspect it doesn't affect many others as well,
especially those
Yes, right now it's rpc/enc.
The overloading is a management decision for me - there's really no
flexibility despite talking about some of these issues.
Definitely important points for others to consider before doing it though.
Thanks,
Charles
Nelson Minar wrote:
Is it possible to overload method
Elliot,
In general, reducing functionality will raise interoperability issues - that
observation applies to the deprecation of rpc/literal as well.
Given the two major style/usage combinations, i.e., rpc/encoded and
document/literal, the latter seems to me a superior model mainly because all
refe
>Is it possible to overload methods and use the WSDL2Java tool to
>generate the stubs for the overloaded methods.
It may work, but it's probably a bad idea. WS-I Basic Profile
explicitly forbids overloading methods. And I wouldn't count on
interop on other platforms. You said elsewhere you were d
Anand et. al,
Can you offer your perspective on the interoperability of rpc/lit in the
future? Dosen't the WS-I Basic Profile 1.0 go a ways to reducing
opportunities for interoperability issues?
Thanks,
Elliot (a ws newbie)
Anand Natrajan wrote:
Charles and Steve,
Mostly for my curiousity, are
Yes, you are right. I'm using rpc/encoding. I'll have to keep the doc/lit
stuff in mind. For now, rpc does the job for me
Steve
- Original Message -
From: "Anand Natrajan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, August 18, 200
Charles and Steve,
Mostly for my curiousity, are you using an rpc/encoded service or a
document/literal service? My information may be wrong, but I believe the
latter doesn't support overloaded methods. Given that the web services
world is moving to doc/lit, having overloaded methods may be ill-ad
Thanks Steve,
Got it now on the same setup.
Looks like the problem was in the WSDL file.
Explicitly setting the name attribute of the operation within the
binding and then have it correspond to the name attribute of the input
in the corresponding portType operation fixed it.
XMLSpy v5 r2 messed
It works for me in Axis 1.1 with Tomcat 5
Steve
.
- Original Message -
From: "Charles Roy" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, August 18, 2004 1:55 PM
Subject: WSDL2Java overloading functions
> Hi,
>
> Is it possible to overload methods and use the WSDL2Java t
11 matches
Mail list logo
