RE: SOAP w attachment throughput low compared to ftp

2005-01-26 Thread Roy Willy Haug
utilization. Which is close to the results I got using ftp and also good enough for our purposes. Regards, Roy Willy Haug > -Original Message- > From: Roy Willy Haug > Sent: 21. desember 2004 14:48 > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: SOAP w attachment throughput low compared t

Re: SOAP w attachment throughput low compared to ftp

2004-12-23 Thread Vy Ho
There was a post here that has performance problem with attachment. When using buffered io, the performance shoot up 10 times. I wonder it also applies to your case.

Re: SOAP w attachment throughput low compared to ftp

2004-12-22 Thread ANDREW MICONE
How are you running Axis? If you are running Apache and the jk2 connector to tomcat you may see some performance improvements using tomcat in standalone mode. I don't have any hard data, but people have commented that my web services seem "admiriably faster" than other implementations. The way I

SOAP w attachment throughput low compared to ftp

2004-12-21 Thread Roy Willy Haug
I am transferring files as SOAP with Attachments using the javax.activiation.DataHandler and Axis 1.1 in a Gigabit network. The maximum throughput using my simple Axis program is between 9 MBps and 14MBps and a network utilization of only 8%. (MBps = MegaByte per second) Neither CPU, disk or net