I recently read the karmic-notify-osd proposal and it has a section for what
is to done when applications are fullscreen, it currently states that
non-critical bubbles must be suppressed.
Are notifications from pidgin/empathy considered critical or non-critical?
I think that the right way of
Em Sáb, 2009-07-04 às 10:15 +0200, Steve Dodier escreveu:
I don't think (b) is a good idea for the following reasons :
* When the user shuts the PC down, he doesn't expect to give it
attention anymore. An update can fail or be interrupted for some
reasons (package missing on a server,
2009/7/4 Steve Dodier sidnio...@gmail.com:
* What about laptops ? Sometimes you shutdown your laptop because you're
about to move. Do you want, in this case, to have to wait for the upgrade to
perform ?
I know a few people who initiate the shutdown process, and as they are
in a hurry will
On Mon, 6 Jul 2009 12:15:33 +0530
Praveen tgpravee...@gmail.com wrote:
I recently read the karmic-notify-osd proposal and it has a section
for what is to done when applications are fullscreen, it currently
states that non-critical bubbles must be suppressed.
Are notifications from
On Sat, Jul 4, 2009 at 4:03 AM, Mark Shuttleworth m...@ubuntu.com wrote:
Updates-on-login are interesting, but I think fatally flawed because of the
common requirement to reboot after updates.
This is actually the case where update on login works best. Any other time
rebooting is totally
On sab, 2009-07-04 at 15:31 -0300, Paulo J. S. Silva wrote:
That is a good point. However, the likelihood of a failure in a
security
update that doesn't allow for a clean shutdown is very low (it never
happened to me and I use Linux since 1994).
I know that perhaps it is overkill to talk
On Mon, Jul 6, 2009 at 11:18 PM, Vincenzo Ciancia cian...@di.unipi.itwrote:
On lun, 2009-07-06 at 22:33 +0530, Praveen wrote:
I recently read the karmic-notify-osd proposal and it has a section
for what is to done when applications are fullscreen, it currently
states that
Alex Launi wrote:
On Sat, Jul 4, 2009 at 4:03 AM, Mark Shuttleworth m...@ubuntu.com
mailto:m...@ubuntu.com wrote:
Updates-on-login are interesting, but I think fatally flawed
because of the common requirement to reboot after updates.
This is actually the case where update on login
On 07/06/2009 08:21 PM, David Siegel wrote:
Mark Shuttleworth wrote:
Alex Launi wrote:
On Sat, Jul 4, 2009 at 4:03 AM, Mark Shuttleworth m...@ubuntu.com
mailto:m...@ubuntu.com wrote:
Updates-on-login are interesting, but I think fatally flawed
because of the common requirement to
On Sat, 2009-07-04 at 10:15 +0200, Steve Dodier wrote:
I don't think (b) is a good idea for the following reasons :
* When the user shuts the PC down, he doesn't expect to give it
attention anymore. An update can fail or be interrupted for some
reasons (package missing on a server, internet
On Mon, 06 Jul 2009 20:46:19 -0400 Joshua Blount jos...@canonical.com
wrote:
On 07/06/2009 08:21 PM, David Siegel wrote:
Mark Shuttleworth wrote:
Alex Launi wrote:
On Sat, Jul 4, 2009 at 4:03 AM, Mark Shuttleworth m...@ubuntu.com
mailto:m...@ubuntu.com wrote:
Updates-on-login are
11 matches
Mail list logo
