On 22/04/10 21:26, Martin Owens wrote:
Hello Mark,
On Thu, 2010-04-22 at 08:49 +0100, Mark Shuttleworth wrote:
It's a good point. The workspaces experience has languished, and I'd
like for us to climb in and improve it substantially. At the moment,
we
do a half-hearted job - we ship
Guys, this is an excellent discussion. Will someone please volunteer
to organize some of what's been said on a wiki page, or Google
Doc/Wave, or something? Otherwise these ideas will likely never escape
this thread.
David
On Fri, Apr 23, 2010 at 6:41 AM, Robin Anderson afisy...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, 2010-04-22 at 10:27 +0200, Conscious User wrote:
I'd welcome a discussion about how we could make workspaces *great*. If
we can do that, then we would make more of them. And your contribution
above is a useful start: great workspaces give you easy access to some
apps regardless of
On Thu, 2010-04-22 at 15:53 +0200, Conscious User wrote:
That's true, we haven't done as good a job of communication in the past
as we could have. But we're working on improving it. For this issue
yesterday there were posts on design.canonical.com,
markshuttleworth.com, this mailing list,
On Fri, 2010-04-23 at 10:14 +0100, David Siegel wrote:
Guys, this is an excellent discussion. Will someone please volunteer
to organize some of what's been said on a wiki page, or Google
Doc/Wave, or something? Otherwise these ideas will likely never escape
this thread.
David
There you go
On 23 April 2010 11:10, Vishnoo drkv...@yahoo.com wrote:
On Fri, 2010-04-23 at 10:14 +0100, David Siegel wrote:
Guys, this is an excellent discussion. Will someone please volunteer
to organize some of what's been said on a wiki page, or Google
Doc/Wave, or something? Otherwise these ideas will
Plus, as I pointed out several months ago, this is a HUGE security hole.
Passwords should only be given in response to a user initiated
operation. Asynchronous dialogs that ask for passwords are a very bad
precedent for a secure O/S.
Best we get those finger-swipe gadgets working, then
On 23 April 2010 06:19, Frederik Nnaji wrote:
how about tagging files and folders in nautilus?
i wouldn't have to move them around much anymore, if i could attach
tags to them.
imagine you don't have to move your files around physically anymore,
you just navigate them via tagging..
on a fs
Hrm. whaaat..
Design Communication is essential for the developer community, and for
the designers to layout the future plans , to co-ordinate the design
implementation. This part is improving and the design team's blog is the
start of such improvements.
This should not be of concern for
I have just been looking at the gnome-shell wikis, and I have found some
mockups for suggested window management. I think the idea is quite good,
could replace the workspaces. Someone has already sent a mail with a mockup
similar to these, but this is a bit more detailed... check them out.
The blog I made reference too will address many of the proposed
solutions here, albeit in a critical manner to root out good
solutions. I can archive the conversation in a shared google doc, with
permission from everyone involved.
On Apr 23, 2010, at 2:14 AM, David Siegel
Ignore that last blank one. Thanks for making the wiki!
On Apr 23, 2010, at 3:10 AM, Vishnoo drkv...@yahoo.com wrote:
On Fri, 2010-04-23 at 10:14 +0100, David Siegel wrote:
Guys, this is an excellent discussion. Will someone please volunteer
to organize some of what's been said on a wiki
Silly iPod touch keeps goofing up my email and sending before I finish.
Here's the poll:
http://www.omgubuntu.co.uk/2010/04/workspaces-and-how-we-use-them.html
On Apr 23, 2010, at 7:02 AM, Luke Benstead kaz...@gmail.com wrote:
On 23 April 2010 14:17, Roth Robert evf...@gmail.com wrote:
I have
On Fri, Apr 23, 2010 at 13:58, Diego Moya turi...@gmail.com wrote:
On 23 April 2010 06:19, Frederik Nnaji wrote:
how about tagging files and folders in nautilus?
i wouldn't have to move them around much anymore, if i could attach
tags to them.
imagine you don't have to move your files around
On Fri, 2010-04-23 at 11:36 -0700, Eric Pritchett wrote:
I'd like to suggest having a Compact Menu View mode enabled by default
for most windows/apps. The thinking is if a user only uses the File,
Edit, View, Help, etc 5 times out of 100 and uses the icons below it
95/100 times then wouldn't
How about a compact menu that is accompanied by a search bar, not dissimilar
from the Start Menu to be found in Windows Vista/7? Navigate the menus if
you know where a command is to be found, otherwise just start typing the
name.
This could be aided by some mechanism for then informing the user
The proposal to merge lp:~cjcurran/indicator-sound/volume_setting_code_refactor
into lp:indicator-sound has been updated.
Status: Needs review = Merged
--
https://code.launchpad.net/~cjcurran/indicator-sound/volume_setting_code_refactor/+merge/23953
Your team ayatana-commits is subscribed
Conor Curran has proposed merging
lp:~cjcurran/indicator-sound/treat-all-volumes-as-mono into lp:indicator-sound.
Requested reviews:
Indicator Applet Developers (indicator-applet-developers)
Essentially this branch refactors all volumes cached to be reduced to one
channel. To do this the
18 matches
Mail list logo
