Op maandag 14-12-2009 om 09:48 uur [tijdzone +], schreef Matthew
Paul Thomas:
The messaging menu design for Lucid indicates that a non-default
application is running using an inward-pointing triangle at the
leading edge of the menu item.
How do you define a non-default application?
This
Jeremy Nickurak wrote:
On Mon, Dec 14, 2009 at 02:51, Matthew Paul Thomas m...@canonical.com
mailto:m...@canonical.com wrote:
The design for Lucid follows this basic approach. An application
should
register itself only if, and as long as, you have an account or
analogous
On Mon, Dec 14, 2009 at 02:51, Matthew Paul Thomas m...@canonical.comwrote:
The design for Lucid follows this basic approach. An application should
register itself only if, and as long as, you have an account or
analogous configuration set up in that application (for example, an
e-mail
Paulo J. S. Silva wrote:
How does a user go from Here's a list of apps you can launch to Here are
some apps that should always start when you log in? Should there be a
dialog asking if you want those apps to auto-start the next time we log in?
I just tried what I thought was the most
Paulo J. S. Silva wrote:
I must agree.
It feels now very odd to see the Systems menu without any icons (only
to open a submenu like Administration or Settings with tons of icons
in it). All other menus in the panel have icons (applications and
places). I don't see why Systems doesn't. I knew
.
I think they want to get away from the old model but they havent
thought of anything concrete to replace it yet.
Regards
Shane Fagan
-Original Message-
From: Mark Shuttleworth m...@ubuntu.com
To: Ayatana List ayatana@lists.launchpad.net
Subject: Re: [Ayatana] Message Indicator: Listing
I must agree.
It feels now very odd to see the Systems menu without any icons (only
to open a submenu like Administration or Settings with tons of icons
in it). All other menus in the panel have icons (applications and
places). I don't see why Systems doesn't. I knew something was
perturbing me
mac_v wrote:
We could use icon and toggle transparencies to show if the app is active
or not. Attaching a mockup...
Wow, this is nice!
I think this is getting us there, but I still feel we need a stronger
indication that the application isn't running.
How about we had the text, underneath
On Sat, 2009-11-07 at 15:25 -0300, Martin Albisetti wrote:
mac_v wrote:
We could use icon and toggle transparencies to show if the app is active
or not. Attaching a mockup...
Wow, this is nice!
I think this is getting us there, but I still feel we need a stronger
indication that the
Scott E. Armitage wrote:
I disagree. If the menu options clearly invite you to DTRT, then
you shouldn't have to worry about things like the process is
running. You click on the menu, you start watching email, you get
notifications, you jump to your relevant email folder.
Martin Albisetti wrote:
Yes, this may be a good idea so we can guarantee a certain level of
sanity with our default applications (or the ones we have in our repos).
The current discussions I had with MPT about a related matter panned out
roughly like this:
- the main, default apps should be
Here's a related question:
I've always had a mail notifiier running all the time. I always want it
running. I want it running the *moment* I log in. I don't want to have to
go into a menu and tell it to launch evolution every time I log in. (For
that matter, I really don't want the Evolution gui
How does a user go from Here's a list of apps you can launch to Here are
some apps that should always start when you log in? Should there be a
dialog asking if you want those apps to auto-start the next time we log in?
I just tried what I thought was the most obvious path: I opened
On Sat, Nov 7, 2009 at 16:57, Mark Shuttleworth m...@ubuntu.com wrote:
We're really moving away from app icons in menus. Really. Really really
:-)
Can I assume that would preclude using icons in the launcher menu to
indicate things?
___
Mailing
On Sat, 2009-11-07 at 16:12 +, Mark Shuttleworth wrote:
We're really moving away from app icons in menus. Really. Really
really :-)
Mark
___
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~ayatana
Post to : ayatana@lists.launchpad.net
Jeremy Nickurak wrote:
So, what is the indication that the thing is not running? It took me
months to find out that, just because Evolution showed up in the
messaging menu, it didn't mean that part of evolution was running and
checking for new messages. That I had to open the evolution UI in
On Thu, Nov 5, 2009 at 1:42 PM, Mark Shuttleworth m...@ubuntu.com wrote:
In the design discussions, there was supposed to be a difference between
the menu entries when the application is running, and when it is not
running. So, for example:
This isn't good enough. That requires I know the
2009/11/6 Alex Launi alex.la...@gmail.com:
On Thu, Nov 5, 2009 at 1:42 PM, Mark Shuttleworth m...@ubuntu.com wrote:
In the design discussions, there was supposed to be a difference between
the menu entries when the application is running, and when it is not
running. So, for example:
This
2009/9/5 mac_v drkv...@yahoo.com
On Fri, 2009-09-04 at 16:45 -0400, Celeste Lyn Paul wrote:
On Fri, Sep 4, 2009 at 2:39 PM, Mark
Shuttleworthmark.shuttlewo...@canonical.com wrote:
Stuart Langridge wrote:
Am I missing something here? If Pidgin's not running then by definition
I
On Fri, 2009-09-04 at 16:45 -0400, Celeste Lyn Paul wrote:
* If infact the message indicator is indeed an indicator and not
turning into a dashboard, which no one has been able to answer.
I won't be able to answer that, as I have no clue what a dashboard is.
All in all I care very little about
On Sat, Sep 5, 2009 at 9:51 PM, Ted Gouldt...@canonical.com wrote:
On Thu, 2009-09-03 at 17:42 +0300, Juha Siltala wrote:
Is this true? Don't we set our preferred apps in gconf? Can it
not be asked for this information?
There is currently a way to set the preferred applications for a few
Stuart Langridge wrote:
Am I missing something here? If Pidgin's not running then by definition
I can't have any messages in it. Is the messaging menu just another
applications menu but only containing apps which are capable of
generating messages? That seems not all that useful to me, unless
Roderick B. Greening wrote:
Not in my opinion... if it's for indications/messages then it has no right
to pretend to be anything other than that (i.e. a menu). Trying to be a menu,
seems counterintuitive to me. We already have a menu, and presenting the user
with two places to look...
On Fri, Sep 4, 2009 at 2:39 PM, Mark
Shuttleworthmark.shuttlewo...@canonical.com wrote:
Stuart Langridge wrote:
Am I missing something here? If Pidgin's not running then by definition
I can't have any messages in it. Is the messaging menu just another
applications menu but only containing
It seems that this is not a message indicator or message queue as originally
described, but rather a new kind of menu/launcher/accelerator.
The question is, as posed by Celeste, whether the spec and the app line up,
and it appears to not do so.
For me, this should not be a launcher. There
25 matches
Mail list logo
