Re: [AZORES-Genealogy] Clarification of meaning on baptism

2014-10-20 Thread 'Bill Boyd' via Azores Genealogy
Thank you JR. Now I'll need to trace down Maria Victoria do Conde. I believe I have Jose already. Regards, Bill On Oct 19, 2014, at 8:46 PM, JR jmro...@gmail.com wrote: That's right, the godparents are not necessarily married to each other when it states they are marrie;, and most of

RE: [AZORES-Genealogy] Clarification of meaning on baptism

2014-10-19 Thread Erica Botelho
Bill, I read this the same as you. The two godparents are not married to each other. Erica From: azores@googlegroups.com [mailto:azores@googlegroups.com] Sent: Sunday, October 19, 2014 2:42 PM To: azores@googlegroups.com Subject: [AZORES-Genealogy] Clarification of meaning on baptism

Re: [AZORES-Genealogy] Clarification of meaning on baptism

2014-10-19 Thread 'Bill Boyd' via Azores Genealogy
Thank you Erica. Bill On Oct 19, 2014, at 8:06 PM, Erica Botelho audiosource...@qwestoffice.net wrote: Bill, I read this the same as you. The two godparents are not married to each other. Erica From: azores@googlegroups.com [mailto:azores@googlegroups.com] Sent: Sunday, October

Re: [AZORES-Genealogy] Clarification of meaning on baptism

2014-10-19 Thread JR
That's right, the godparents are not necessarily married to each other when it states they are marrie;, and *most* of the time, when they are married, this is written out, but not always. So watch for that. JR On Sunday, October 19, 2014 11:06:50 PM UTC-4, audiosourceinc wrote: Bill, I