Hi
On Sonntag 04 November 2007, Marek Lindner wrote:
...
>
> The batman gateway checks if the tunnelled packet has a known wifi IP
> address corresponding to a known virtual IP address. 104.61.13.37 is
> obviously a wrong IP address. I would guess that this is an OLSR
> address ? May be we have a p
> May be we have to set the source address explicitely. I look into that.
I issued a patch. Could you test that for me (rev 779) ? At the moment
I can't do it myself.
Regards,
Marek
Machen Sie Yahoo! zu Ihrer Startseite. Los geht's:
http://de.yahoo.com/set
> How about forwarding the average TQ-Value of the best ranking neighbor
instead
> of the actual incoming value? This should avoid inconsistency amongst
> TQ-Values to a great degree!
That is what we do now !
It is the reason for the "10 seconds loops". Therefore I proposed to forward
the
in
One more idea:
How about forwarding the average TQ-Value of the best ranking neighbor instead
of the actual incoming value? This should avoid inconsistency amongst
TQ-Values to a great degree!
cu elektra
> >> We'll post a message to the list as soon as we think it is fixed and
> >> worth a try
>> We'll post a message to the list as soon as we think it is fixed and
>> worth a try.
> i never saw that post (maybe i missed it?), so i only tested exp-0.3 :)
Right - i think it is ready to be tested now.
@Elektra: What about activating my latest routing improvement ?
Heute schon
Hi,
> We playing around with B.A.T.M.A.N. 0.3-beta rv767 in our leipziger
> Freifunk-testing-Firmware (based on v1.6.10):
> the Routing works fine (if i start "batmand eth1:bat vlan1:bat") -
> great work!
exciting to hear. Keep us informed about all the trouble you experience
so that we can wo
> > >> I'm sorry to say that 0.3beta is not usable at the moment.
> > >
> > > and my tests with 0.3-beta_~rv720 showed path-detection pretty
> > > broken
> >
> > Well, rev720 is almost 3 weeks old. During that time the new
> > routing algo was quite unstable. Did you also try the newer
> > snapsho
We playing around with B.A.T.M.A.N. 0.3-beta rv767 in our leipziger
Freifunk-testing-Firmware (based on v1.6.10):
the Routing works fine (if i start "batmand eth1:bat vlan1:bat") -
great work!
but the gateway-function (option "-r 2") drives me mad:
* why the tunnel-interface (gateX) now have IP-
Hello Jan -
indeed, your report is the wage for our work. Your application is one of our
prime targets.
Cheers!
cu elektra
On Sun, Nov 04, 2007 at 12:53:13AM +, Marek Lindner wrote:
[..snip..]
>
> >> I'm sorry to say that 0.3beta is not usable at the moment.
> > and my tests with 0.3-beta_~rv720 showed path-detection pretty
> > broken
>
> Well, rev720 is almost 3 weeks old. During that time the new
> routing alg
On Nov 4, 2007, at 1:53 AM, Marek Lindner wrote:
We experienced ~ 200% increase in cpu efficiency and ~ 300% in
network efficiency between 0.4.10 and 0.5.4.
c.f. http://olsr.funkfeuer.at for graphs.
Wow - you are part of the marketing team ?
there is no marketing team. however there was
> We experienced ~ 200% increase in cpu efficiency and ~ 300% in
> network efficiency between 0.4.10 and 0.5.4.
> c.f. http://olsr.funkfeuer.at for graphs.
Wow - you are part of the marketing team ?
I guess B.A.T.M.A.N. has over 1000% increase in efficiency
between 0.01 and now. ;-)
>> I'm s
12 matches
Mail list logo
