Re: [B.A.T.M.A.N.] batman-adv vis_data

Hi! It seems the problem was a misconfiguration! The problem was that batman was activated on eth0 but eth0 was already participating on the bat0 bridge telling batman to use the bridge instead of eth0 fixed everything :D 2011/4/19 Gioacchino Mazzurco : > ok the node number now is increased but

Re: [B.A.T.M.A.N.] batman-adv 2011.1.0 released

many thanks, so I can upgrade my nodes without concern ;) 2011/4/21 Marek Lindner : > On Thursday 21 April 2011 00:07:05 Gioacchino Mazzurco wrote: >> Update some nodes to this version will cause compatibility problem >> with previous version ? > > No, the protocol did not change. > > Regards, > M

Re: [B.A.T.M.A.N.] batman-adv 2011.1.0 released

On Thursday 21 April 2011 00:07:05 Gioacchino Mazzurco wrote: > Update some nodes to this version will cause compatibility problem > with previous version ? No, the protocol did not change. Regards, Marek

Re: [B.A.T.M.A.N.] batman-adv 2011.1.0 released

Update some nodes to this version will cause compatibility problem with previous version ? 2011/4/19 Marek Lindner : > > The B.A.T.M.A.N. team is publishing its second 2011 release - 2011.1.0, > containing major code changes under the hood to improve performance and > scalability plus the usual se

Re: [B.A.T.M.A.N.] batman doesn't see neigh on wired lan

On Wednesday 20 April 2011 22:39:30 Gioacchino Mazzurco wrote: > Here in Pisa we are experiencing a big problem! > > Nodes doesn't see each other on cable! > > below is some data from the 2 nodes > > As you can see nodes receives each other BAT packets but don't see > each other as neighbor... >

[B.A.T.M.A.N.] batman doesn't see neigh on wired lan

Hi! Here in Pisa we are experiencing a big problem! Nodes doesn't see each other on cable! below is some data from the 2 nodes As you can see nodes receives each other BAT packets but don't see each other as neighbor... also batctl tr can confirm it... what is happening? NODE_1 00:15:6d:7d:0

[B.A.T.M.A.N.] [PATCH] batman-adv: Make bat_priv->primary_if an rcu protected pointer

The rcu protected macros rcu_dereference() and rcu_assign_pointer() for the bat_priv->primary_if need to be used, as well as spin/rcu locking. Otherwise we might end up using a primary_if pointer pointing to already freed memory. Signed-off-by: Marek Lindner --- gateway_client.c| 33 +

Re: [B.A.T.M.A.N.] [PATCHv2] batman-adv: Move definition of atomic_dec_not_zero() into main.h

On Wednesday 20 April 2011 09:52:56 Antonio Quartulli wrote: > atomic_dec_not_zero() is very useful and it is currently defined > multiple times. So it is possible to move it in main.h > > Signed-off-by: Antonio Quartulli > Acked-by: Sven Eckelmann Applied in revision f9d05e. Thanks, Marek

[B.A.T.M.A.N.] Fwd: small hw running b.a.t.m.a.n

Hi ! Can the forum give feedback on the smallest embedded hw running b.a.t.m.a.n ? do you have digikey/stores link for that  ? Filipe

Re: [B.A.T.M.A.N.] [PATCH] net: batman-adv: remove rx_csum ethtool_ops

From: Michał Mirosław Date: Tue, 19 Apr 2011 12:43:20 +0200 (CEST) > Signed-off-by: Michał Mirosław Applied.

[B.A.T.M.A.N.] [PATCHv2] batman-adv: Move definition of atomic_dec_not_zero() into main.h

atomic_dec_not_zero() is very useful and it is currently defined multiple times. So it is possible to move it in main.h Signed-off-by: Antonio Quartulli Acked-by: Sven Eckelmann --- aggregation.c |1 - main.h|2 ++ send.c|1 - 3 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 dele

Re: [B.A.T.M.A.N.] [PATCH] batman-adv: Move definition of atomic_dec_not_zero() into main.h

On Wednesday 20 April 2011 08:54:39 Antonio Quartulli wrote: > atomic_dec_not_zero() is very usefull and it is currently defined > multiple times. So it is possible to move it in main.h I would prefer "useful" and a "Signed-off-by:" line. For the rest of the patch: Acked-by: Sven Eckelmann si