On Wed, Apr 27, 2011 at 11:35:04PM +0200, Antonio Quartulli wrote:
The old HNA mechanism has been totally rewritten from scratch.
The new mechanism consists in announcing local translation-table changes
only, reducing the protocol overhead.
Hi Antonia
For details, please visit:
On sab, apr 30, 2011 at 10:42:26 +0200, Andrew Lunn wrote:
Hi Antonia
Hi Andrew, hi all
(don't worry for the typo ;) )
For details, please visit:
http://www.open-mesh.org/wiki/batman-adv/Hna-improvements
This is a nice summary of the idea. The LaTeX document is also good.
Great to see
From: Linus Lüssing linus.luess...@web.de
hardif_remove_interfaces() removes all hard interfaces from the
hardif_list before freeing and cleaning up any device. However the clean
up procedures in orig_hash_del_if()
(hardif_remove_interface()-hardif_disable_interface()-
orig_hash_del_if()) need
hardif_list_lock is unneccessary because we already ensure that no
multiple admin operations can take place through rtnl_lock.
hardif_list_lock only adds additional overhead and complexity.
Critical functions now check whether they are called with rtnl_lock
using ASSERT_RTNL.
Signed-off-by: Sven
You indentation/wrapping is a bit strange. In the function
declaration, i would of put the int tt_num_changes directly under int
buff_pos.
This is what I've done, but it seems that your mail client is messing up
with the tabs (I think).
Possibly. Or the list server. I use mutt, same as