Hi everyone,
During the last Wireless Battlemesh a lot of conceptual
protocol discussions as well as batman-adv kernel-hacking took
place. Therefore also the question came up where and when would be
the best place and time to meet next.
The first idea was to meet at the Wireless Community
Signed-off-by: Marek Lindner lindner_ma...@yahoo.de
---
originator.c |2 --
1 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/originator.c b/originator.c
index ef4a9be..51af91b 100644
--- a/originator.c
+++ b/originator.c
@@ -19,8 +19,6 @@
*
*/
-/* increase the reference
Signed-off-by: Marek Lindner lindner_ma...@yahoo.de
---
compat.h |1 -
1 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/compat.h b/compat.h
index 0c5ad82..bddf7e2 100644
--- a/compat.h
+++ b/compat.h
@@ -26,7 +26,6 @@
#define _NET_BATMAN_ADV_COMPAT_H_
#include
On Monday 02 May 2011 16:38:17 Marek Lindner wrote:
Signed-off-by: Marek Lindner lindner_ma...@yahoo.de
---
originator.c |2 --
1 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/originator.c b/originator.c
index ef4a9be..51af91b 100644
--- a/originator.c
+++
On Mon, May 02, 2011 at 03:25:36PM +0200, Antonio Quartulli wrote:
Hi all,
On lun, mag 02, 2011 at 03:10:44 +0200, Linus Lüssing wrote:
Therefore the second idea was to have a dedicated B.A.T.M.A.N.
developer meeting between these two dates.
Great ;)
Place: Lübeck (near Hamburg,
On Monday 02 May 2011 16:53:44 Marek Lindner wrote:
Signed-off-by: Marek Lindner lindner_ma...@yahoo.de
[]
#include linux/version.h /* LINUX_VERSION_CODE */
-#include bat_sysfs.h /* struct bat_attribute */
This is necessary for kernels older than 2.6.24
make -C
On Monday 02 May 2011 17:02:32 Sven Eckelmann wrote:
On Monday 02 May 2011 16:53:44 Marek Lindner wrote:
Signed-off-by: Marek Lindner lindner_ma...@yahoo.de
[]
#include linux/version.h /* LINUX_VERSION_CODE */
-#include bat_sysfs.h /* struct bat_attribute */
On Monday 02 May 2011 17:09:31 Marek Lindner wrote:
On Monday 02 May 2011 17:02:32 Sven Eckelmann wrote:
On Monday 02 May 2011 16:53:44 Marek Lindner wrote:
Signed-off-by: Marek Lindner lindner_ma...@yahoo.de
[]
#include linux/version.h /* LINUX_VERSION_CODE */
On Monday 02 May 2011 17:09:31 Marek Lindner wrote:
On Monday 02 May 2011 17:02:32 Sven Eckelmann wrote:
On Monday 02 May 2011 16:53:44 Marek Lindner wrote:
Signed-off-by: Marek Lindner lindner_ma...@yahoo.de
[]
#include linux/version.h /* LINUX_VERSION_CODE */
On Mon, May 02, 2011 at 05:27:36PM +0200, Sven Eckelmann wrote:
On Monday 02 May 2011 17:09:31 Marek Lindner wrote:
On Monday 02 May 2011 17:02:32 Sven Eckelmann wrote:
On Monday 02 May 2011 16:53:44 Marek Lindner wrote:
Signed-off-by: Marek Lindner lindner_ma...@yahoo.de
[]
Looks quite good and seems to make sense to avoid the
double-locking. Tested it here and together with patch 1/3 fixes
the initial issue, too.
Just one minor thing:
[58518.225154] batman_adv: bat0: The MTU of interface eth1 is too
small (1500) to handle the transport of batman-adv packets.
Looks good, seems to make sense and tried it. Works so far with no
call traces or other uggly stuff. However I'm still trying to
reproduce the initial issue of ticket #145 to confirm that this
patch fixes it (used a different kernel and batman-adv version
back then, of course... so somehow the
Ok, could reproduce and verify it now (latest master branch
_without_ patches 1/3 and 2/3, with that version I can still
reproduce that issue reliably). Putting only patch 3/3 on top the
master branch then fixes that locking dependancy. Thanks, Sven!
Cheers, Linus
On Mon, May 02, 2011 at
On Sat, Apr 30, 2011 at 06:56:58PM +0200, Sven Eckelmann wrote:
From: Linus Lüssing linus.luess...@web.de
hardif_remove_interfaces() removes all hard interfaces from the
hardif_list before freeing and cleaning up any device. However the clean
up procedures in orig_hash_del_if()
Linus Lüssing wrote:
Looks quite good and seems to make sense to avoid the
double-locking. Tested it here and together with patch 1/3 fixes
the initial issue, too.
Just one minor thing:
[58518.225154] batman_adv: bat0: The MTU of interface eth1 is too
small (1500) to handle the
hardif_list_lock is unneccessary because we already ensure that no
multiple admin operations can take place through rtnl_lock.
hardif_list_lock only adds additional overhead and complexity.
Critical functions now check whether they are called with rtnl_lock
using ASSERT_RTNL.
It indirectly fixes
The hard_if_event is called by the notifier with rtnl_lock and tries to
remove sysfs entries when a NETDEV_UNREGISTER event is received. This
will automatically take the s_active lock.
The s_active lock is also used when a new interface is added to a meshif
through sysfs. In that situation we
Hey Linus,
this sounds great, I would really like to join.
My preferred date would be June 30th to July 3rd,
I already have tickets for an event on July 9th unfortunately. The weekends
after July 9th (like 16th, 23th) are also available for me. :)
Sounds like the others prefer the first date?
From: Sven Eckelmann s...@narfation.org
Date: Sun, 1 May 2011 23:10:30 +0200
I would like to propose following patches for net-next-2.6/2.6.40. Marek
Lindner continued to convert different datastructures to use RCU. Antonio
Quartulli fixed an important bug introduced in the last patchset
19 matches
Mail list logo
