Re: [B.A.T.M.A.N.] Understanding MAC-Adresses in iptables-Logs

2015-02-18 Thread Marek Lindner
On Sunday, January 25, 2015 14:24:17 Jan Lühr wrote: there appears to be some misconfiguration in our network. A gateway is blocking unknown ip-addresses: [658047.514011] FORWARD DROPPEDIN=bat0 OUT=backbone MAC=3a:81:5b:64:fa:32:08:fc:88:9b:8a:60:08:00:45:00:00:4f:6c:b1:40:00:3f:06:

Re: [B.A.T.M.A.N.] Question concerning batman-adv bug #173 Mesh packets on bat0

2015-02-18 Thread Marek Lindner
On Wednesday, February 18, 2015 08:35:49 Andreas Pape wrote: I'm interested if there is any progress concerning the bug entry #173 ( http://www.open-mesh.org/issues/173). I'm currently observing something similiar on an embedded system running an older kernel 2.6.32.26. Batman-adv versions up

[B.A.T.M.A.N.] [PATCHv2] batman-adv: Use safer default config for optional features

2015-02-18 Thread Sven Eckelmann
The current default settings for optional features in batman-adv seems to be based around the idea that the user only compiles what he requires. They will automatically enabled when they are compiled in. For example the network coding part of batman-adv is by default disabled in the out-of-tree

Re: [B.A.T.M.A.N.] [PATCHv2] batman-adv: Use safer default config for optional features

2015-02-18 Thread Martin Hundebøll
Acked-by: Martin Hundebøll mar...@hundeboll.net On 2015-02-18 18:20, Sven Eckelmann wrote: The current default settings for optional features in batman-adv seems to be based around the idea that the user only compiles what he requires. They will automatically enabled when they are compiled in.

Re: [B.A.T.M.A.N.] [PATCH] batman-adv: Use safer default config for optional features

2015-02-18 Thread Martin Hundebøll
Hi Sven, Marek, On 2015-02-18 08:33, Marek Lindner wrote: On Thursday, February 05, 2015 17:22:53 Sven Eckelmann wrote: The current default settings for optional features in batman-adv seems to be based around the idea that the user only compiles what he requires. They will automatically

Re: [B.A.T.M.A.N.] Antwort: Re: Antwort: Antwort: Re: Antwort: Re: Question concerning batman-adv bug #173 Mesh packets on bat0

2015-02-18 Thread Marek Lindner
On Wednesday, February 18, 2015 17:10:12 Andreas Pape wrote: The essential call is in patch 2 as assumed. As soon as I add the netdev_master_upper_dev_link call again to the compilable code, the problem starts to occur (mesh doesn't work as soon as bat0 is added to the bridge, ogm packets can

[B.A.T.M.A.N.] [PATCH] batman-adv: checkpatch - spaces preferred around that '*'

2015-02-18 Thread Marek Lindner
Signed-off-by: Marek Lindner mareklind...@neomailbox.ch --- main.h | 2 +- network-coding.c | 2 +- 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/main.h b/main.h index 515bf5a..b6c9ece 100644 --- a/main.h +++ b/main.h @@ -44,7 +44,7 @@ #define

[B.A.T.M.A.N.] [PATCH] batman-adv: checkpatch - comparison to NULL could be rewritten

2015-02-18 Thread Marek Lindner
Signed-off-by: Marek Lindner mareklind...@neomailbox.ch --- soft-interface.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/soft-interface.c b/soft-interface.c index 8748987..d41746b 100644 --- a/soft-interface.c +++ b/soft-interface.c @@ -824,7 +824,7 @@ static int

Re: [B.A.T.M.A.N.] Antwort: Antwort: Re: Antwort: Re: Question concerning batman-adv bug #173 Mesh packets on bat0

2015-02-18 Thread Marek Lindner
On Wednesday, February 18, 2015 16:22:18 Andreas Pape wrote: good news: the sum of the three patches you sent solved the problem as far as I have tested yet. Now bat0 works in combination with the bridge and also ethernet traffic is bridged into the mini-mesh setup I use correctly.

Re: [B.A.T.M.A.N.] Antwort: Re: Question concerning batman-adv bug #173 Mesh packets on bat0

2015-02-18 Thread Marek Lindner
On Wednesday, February 18, 2015 13:28:27 Andreas Pape wrote: I adapted your patch to batman-adv-2014.4.0 without success. I got the additional issue that with the patched version of batman-adv I was not able to destroy the virtual wireless interface anymore used fot the adhoc connection over

[B.A.T.M.A.N.] Antwort: Re: Antwort: Re: Question concerning batman-adv bug #173 Mesh packets on bat0

2015-02-18 Thread Andreas Pape
At this point the mesh is working to your expectation ? Can you transport payload across the mesh ? If so, this is a deviation from #173 - wouldn't you agree ? Before adding bat0 to the bridge br0 I can communicate via the mesh interface. I configured ip addresses for the bat0 interfaces on