Re: [B.A.T.M.A.N.] batman-adv: loop caused by tinc and wifi

Hi, On Mo, 26.09.2011 02:15:46, Bjoern Franke wrote: > ath1 (ad-hoc) as batman-adv-interfaces > ath0 (ap), tap0, eth0.1 and bat0 as a bridge > Most of the nodes are connected via tinc and the network runs fine. But if > two > nodes which have a tinc connection also get a ath1-connection, the wh

Re: [B.A.T.M.A.N.] Multiple DHCP Gateways

Hi, > I´m testing the Gateway roaming capabilities […] > […], even if it doesn´t […] > […] I guess that´s because these subsequent DHCP requests […] Please don’t use the accute as an apostrophe. You could use “ ' ” (U+0027/ASCII) or even better a typografically true “ ’ ” (U+2019)… Best Regards,

Re: [B.A.T.M.A.N.] Problem with B.A.T.M.A.N. 0.3.1 rv1206 (compatibility version 5)

Hello, Am Montag, 23. März 2009 schrieb Marek Lindner: > I guess OpenWRT uses some different libs / compile > time options / etc that provoke that problem. I hope I understood this thread right… I run OpenWRT whiterussion RC6 with libpthread 0.9.27-1 and it runs ok with batmand_0.3.1-current_mi

Re: [B.A.T.M.A.N.] Hiding Local Topology ??? TTL

Am Mittwoch, 11. März 2009 schrieb Sven Eckelmann: > There is a document written by Axel to describe what he tries to do > or did. I don't if it is up to date, but it is currently the best > hint I can give you: > http://downloads.open-mesh.net/batman/misc/bmx.pdf Very Cool, I'll read soon. Thanks

[B.A.T.M.A.N.] batmand ⇔ AF_INET6

Hello once again, BM does not let me go. Any complaints about sending badmand's broadcasts over ipv6? Has anyone experience with meshes and ipv6 autoconfiguration? Thanks, Greetings P.M.

Re: [B.A.T.M.A.N.] Hiding Local Topology ??? TTL

Hello again, Am Donnerstag, 5. März 2009 schrieb Sven Eckelmann: > Please read http://open-mesh.net/wiki/BranchesExplained to understand > basic differences between the "brands". Ok did it. Obviously "batman" stands for an algorithm on one hand and implementation on the other hand… Can you say

Re: [B.A.T.M.A.N.] Hiding Local Topology – TTL

Arrgh, Am Donnerstag, 5. März 2009 schrieb P. Mazart: > Hello & Thank's for your reply, […] > Ahh. Great. Thank's for the information. „Thank's“ – Shouldn't have done this…

Re: [B.A.T.M.A.N.] Hiding Local Topology – TTL

Hello & Thank's for your reply, Am Donnerstag, 5. März 2009 schrieb Marek Lindner: > This paper just mentions the possibilities - not all flavors > implement that feature. As far as I know bmx (batman-experimental) > supports it though. Now I'm completely stuck with BM's brands. :-) Can you say

Re: [B.A.T.M.A.N.] Hiding Local Topology – TTL

Hello again, Am Dienstag, 3. März 2009 schrieb P. Mazart: > How do I exactly set the TTL-Value for one or more of the specified > interfaces? How about the vis-server? Does it need a route back to the Source? (i.e. an „invisible“ back-bone-node) How often does BM send its status to t

[B.A.T.M.A.N.] Hiding Local Topology – TTL

Hello BM friends and developers, Concerning „B.A.T.M.A.N Status Report“ from June 28, 2007: •„2.1.7 Hiding Local Topology Information Beyond the Neighborhood“ How do I exactly set the TTL-Value for one or more of the specified interfaces? Thank You, Best Regards Peter