Re: [B.A.T.M.A.N.] [PATCH] batman-adv-kernelland linux-2.6.21 compatibility

2008-07-18 Thread Marek Lindner
On Thursday, 17. July 2008 16:00:54 Simon Wunderlich wrote: > thank you for the patch, it looks good to me so i applied it. Having a > compat.h is a good idea, maybe we should use it even more to get rid of > some ugly #ifdef's. :) Yes, I agree - I like that idea. > We welcome any kind of patche

Re: [B.A.T.M.A.N.] [PATCH] batman-adv-kernelland linux-2.6.21 compatibility

2008-07-17 Thread Scott Raynel
Hi Simon, On 17/07/2008, at 8:00 PM, Simon Wunderlich wrote: Hey Scott, thank you for the patch, it looks good to me so i applied it. Having a compat.h is a good idea, maybe we should use it even more to get rid of some ugly #ifdef's. :) I've tested your patch against various kernels, it se

Re: [B.A.T.M.A.N.] [PATCH] batman-adv-kernelland linux-2.6.21 compatibility

2008-07-17 Thread Simon Wunderlich
Hey Scott, thank you for the patch, it looks good to me so i applied it. Having a compat.h is a good idea, maybe we should use it even more to get rid of some ugly #ifdef's. :) I've tested your patch against various kernels, it seems to work until 2.6.20, but breaks for 2.6.19. We welcome any k

[B.A.T.M.A.N.] [PATCH] batman-adv-kernelland linux-2.6.21 compatibility

2008-07-17 Thread Scott Raynel
Hi there, Not sure how you guys want patches submitted, so point me in the right direction if this is not it. Here's a simple patch that enables compilation on linux-2.6.21 (and possibly earlier, though I've tested 2.6.16 and it doesn't work). Cheers, -- Scott Raynel WAND Network Researc