This patch covers the case of a bla setup with enabled dat if none of the
common gateways of the same backbone has already knowledge of the searched
ip address and therefore has to ask via dat some of the other mesh nodes.
A broadcast arp request is coming from the backbone and each backbone
gateway starts an address resolution via other dat mesh nodes. In this
case it should be prevented that multiple answers from dat enabled mesh
nodes reach the backbone gateways leading to multiple replies in a common
backbone again.

Signed-off-by: Andreas Pape <ap...@phoenixcontact.com>
---
 net/batman-adv/distributed-arp-table.c |   63 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
 1 files changed, 62 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)

diff --git a/net/batman-adv/distributed-arp-table.c 
b/net/batman-adv/distributed-arp-table.c
index fe46a3d..53149e2 100644
--- a/net/batman-adv/distributed-arp-table.c
+++ b/net/batman-adv/distributed-arp-table.c
@@ -1081,6 +1081,8 @@ bool batadv_dat_snoop_incoming_arp_request(struct 
batadv_priv *bat_priv,
        u8 *hw_src;
        struct sk_buff *skb_new;
        struct batadv_dat_entry *dat_entry = NULL;
+       struct batadv_unicast_4addr_packet *unicast_4addr_packet;
+       struct batadv_orig_node *orig_node = NULL;
        bool ret = false;
        unsigned short vid;
        int err;
@@ -1104,8 +1106,35 @@ bool batadv_dat_snoop_incoming_arp_request(struct 
batadv_priv *bat_priv,
        batadv_dat_entry_add(bat_priv, ip_src, hw_src, vid);

        dat_entry = batadv_dat_entry_hash_find(bat_priv, ip_dst, vid);
-       if (!dat_entry)
+       if (!dat_entry) {
+               /* Check if this is a 4addr unicast DAT_DHT_GET frame from
+                * another backbone gw of the same backbone. If yes, drop
+                * it as this leads to multiplication of arp requests in bla
+                * setups as long as there is no dat_entry fo this answer.
+                * In this case better drop the DHT_GET. Normal bla code
+                * doesn't take care of these packets as they are tunneled
+                * via unicast.
+                */
+               unicast_4addr_packet =
+                               (struct batadv_unicast_4addr_packet *)skb->data;
+               orig_node =
+                       batadv_orig_hash_find(bat_priv, 
unicast_4addr_packet->src);
+               if (orig_node) {
+                       if ((unicast_4addr_packet->u.packet_type == 
BATADV_UNICAST_4ADDR) &&
+                               (unicast_4addr_packet->subtype == 
BATADV_P_DAT_DHT_GET) &&
+                               (batadv_bla_is_backbone_gw(skb, orig_node, 
hdr_size))) {
+                               batadv_dbg(BATADV_DBG_DAT, bat_priv, "Doubled 
ARP request removed: "
+                                       "ARP MSG = [src: %pM-%pI4 dst: 
%pM-%pI4]; originator: %pM\n",
+                                       hw_src, &ip_src,
+                                       batadv_arp_hw_dst(skb, hdr_size), 
&ip_dst,
+                                       unicast_4addr_packet->src);
+                               ret = true;
+                       }
+                       batadv_orig_node_put(orig_node);
+               }
+
                goto out;
+       }

        skb_new = arp_create(ARPOP_REPLY, ETH_P_ARP, ip_src,
                             bat_priv->soft_iface, ip_dst, hw_src,
@@ -1204,6 +1233,7 @@ bool batadv_dat_snoop_incoming_arp_reply(struct 
batadv_priv *bat_priv,
        __be32 ip_src, ip_dst;
        u8 *hw_src, *hw_dst;
        bool dropped = false;
+       struct batadv_dat_entry *dat_entry = NULL;
        unsigned short vid;

        if (!atomic_read(&bat_priv->distributed_arp_table))
@@ -1223,12 +1253,41 @@ bool batadv_dat_snoop_incoming_arp_reply(struct 
batadv_priv *bat_priv,
        hw_dst = batadv_arp_hw_dst(skb, hdr_size);
        ip_dst = batadv_arp_ip_dst(skb, hdr_size);

+       /* If ip_dst is already in cache and has the right mac address,
+        * drop this frame if this ARP reply is destined for us. We have
+        * most probably received already a reply from someone else. Delivering
+        * this frame would lead to doubled receive of an ARP reply.
+        */
+       dat_entry = batadv_dat_entry_hash_find(bat_priv, ip_src, vid);
+       if ((dat_entry) && (batadv_compare_eth(hw_src, dat_entry->mac_addr))) {
+               batadv_dbg(BATADV_DBG_DAT, bat_priv, "Doubled ARP reply 
removed: "
+                       "ARP MSG = [src: %pM-%pI4 dst: %pM-%pI4]; dat_entry: 
%pM-%pI4\n",
+                       hw_src, &ip_src, hw_dst, &ip_dst, dat_entry->mac_addr,
+                       &dat_entry->ip);
+               dropped = true;
+               goto out;
+       }
+
        /* Update our internal cache with both the IP addresses the node got
         * within the ARP reply
         */
        batadv_dat_entry_add(bat_priv, ip_src, hw_src, vid);
        batadv_dat_entry_add(bat_priv, ip_dst, hw_dst, vid);

+       /* If BLA is enabled, only forward ARP replies if we have claimed the
+        * source of the ARP reply or if no one else of the same backbone has
+        * already claimed that client. This prevents that different gateways
+        * to the same backbone all forward the ARP reply leading to multiple
+        * replies in the backbone.
+        */
+       if (!batadv_bla_handle_local_claim(bat_priv, hw_src, vid)) {
+               batadv_dbg(BATADV_DBG_DAT, bat_priv,
+                       "Device %pM claimed by another backbone gw. Drop ARP 
reply.\n",
+                       hw_src);
+               dropped = true;
+               goto out;
+       }
+
        /* if this REPLY is directed to a client of mine, let's deliver the
         * packet to the interface
         */
@@ -1241,6 +1300,8 @@ bool batadv_dat_snoop_incoming_arp_reply(struct 
batadv_priv *bat_priv,
 out:
        if (dropped)
                kfree_skb(skb);
+       if (dat_entry)
+               batadv_dat_entry_put(dat_entry);
        /* if dropped == false -> deliver to the interface */
        return dropped;
 }
--
1.7.0.4



..................................................................
PHOENIX CONTACT ELECTRONICS GmbH

Sitz der Gesellschaft / registered office of the company: 31812 Bad Pyrmont
USt-Id-Nr.: DE811742156
Amtsgericht Hannover HRB 100528 / district court Hannover HRB 100528
Geschäftsführer / Executive Board: Roland Bent, Dr. Martin Heubeck
___________________________________________________________________
Diese E-Mail enthält vertrauliche und/oder rechtlich geschützte Informationen. 
Wenn Sie nicht der richtige Adressat sind oder diese E-Mail irrtümlich erhalten 
haben, informieren Sie bitte sofort den Absender und vernichten Sie diese Mail. 
Das unerlaubte Kopieren, jegliche anderweitige Verwendung sowie die unbefugte 
Weitergabe dieser Mail ist nicht gestattet.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
This e-mail may contain confidential and/or privileged information. If you are 
not the intended recipient (or have received this e-mail in error) please 
notify the sender immediately and destroy this e-mail. Any unauthorized 
copying, disclosure, distribution or other use of the material or parts thereof 
is strictly forbidden.
___________________________________________________________________

Reply via email to