From: Paul E. McKenney <paul...@linux.vnet.ibm.com>

The RCU callback neigh_node_free_rcu() just calls kfree(), so we can use
kfree_rcu() instead of call_rcu().

Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paul...@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Marek Lindner <lindner_ma...@yahoo.de>
Cc: Simon Wunderlich <s...@hrz.tu-chemnitz.de>
Cc: Sven Eckelmann <s...@narfation.org>
Acked-by: David S. Miller <da...@davemloft.net>
Signed-off-by: Sven Eckelmann <s...@narfation.org>
---
 originator.c |   10 +---------
 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)

diff --git a/originator.c b/originator.c
index ef4a9be..05cc738 100644
--- a/originator.c
+++ b/originator.c
@@ -56,18 +56,10 @@ err:
        return 0;
 }
 
-static void neigh_node_free_rcu(struct rcu_head *rcu)
-{
-       struct neigh_node *neigh_node;
-
-       neigh_node = container_of(rcu, struct neigh_node, rcu);
-       kfree(neigh_node);
-}
-
 void neigh_node_free_ref(struct neigh_node *neigh_node)
 {
        if (atomic_dec_and_test(&neigh_node->refcount))
-               call_rcu(&neigh_node->rcu, neigh_node_free_rcu);
+               kfree_rcu(neigh_node, rcu);
 }
 
 /* increases the refcounter of a found router */
-- 
1.7.4.4

Reply via email to