On Thursday, February 19, 2015 09:31:08 Andreas Pape wrote:
> the problem seems to be a little bit more complex. Your latest patch does
> not solve the problem.
>
> But I found out, that commenting out the following line in your patch
> makes bat0 work:
>
> slave->master = master;
>
> But as this i
Hi Marek,
the problem seems to be a little bit more complex. Your latest patch does
not solve the problem.
But I found out, that commenting out the following line in your patch
makes bat0 work:
slave->master = master;
But as this is the core of "enslaving" a device to a master device, this
b
On Wednesday, February 18, 2015 17:10:12 Andreas Pape wrote:
> The essential call is in patch 2 as assumed. As soon as I add the
> netdev_master_upper_dev_link call again to the compilable code, the
> problem starts to occur (mesh doesn't work as soon as bat0 is added to the
> bridge, ogm packets c
Hi Marek,
I reverted the changes step by step starting with patch
0002-remove-netdev_calls.patch, as patch 1 did not help and patch 3
containes in compat.h and soft-interface.c, I tried out myself earlier
today.
The essential call is in patch 2 as assumed. As soon as I add the
netdev_master_u
