Re: [Babel-users] [Cerowrt-devel] ipv6 confusion with source specific gateways.

2014-11-25 Thread Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
>default from :: via fe80::201:5cff:ee62:b646 dev ge00 proto static >metric 1024 ># should I even have a default route at all? The source on this is actually ::/128 so it's not a default route in the sense that it will forward arbitrary traffic through it. It is needed for IPv6 packets that o

Re: [Babel-users] [Cerowrt-devel] ipv6 confusion with source specific gateways.

2014-12-01 Thread Juliusz Chroboczek
>> default from :: via fe80::201:5cff:ee62:b646 dev ge00 proto static metric >> 1024 # should I even have a default route at all? > > The source on this is actually ::/128 You mean ::/0. > It is needed for IPv6 packets that originate on the host but where the > application doesn't specify an addr

Re: [Babel-users] [Cerowrt-devel] ipv6 confusion with source specific gateways.

2014-12-01 Thread Dave Taht
On Mon, Dec 1, 2014 at 6:15 PM, Juliusz Chroboczek wrote: >>> default from :: via fe80::201:5cff:ee62:b646 dev ge00 proto static metric >>> 1024 # should I even have a default route at all? >> >> The source on this is actually ::/128 > > You mean ::/0. > >> It is needed for IPv6 packets that origi

Re: [Babel-users] [Cerowrt-devel] ipv6 confusion with source specific gateways.

2014-12-01 Thread Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
Juliusz Chroboczek writes: >>> default from :: via fe80::201:5cff:ee62:b646 dev ge00 proto static metric >>> 1024 # should I even have a default route at all? >> >> The source on this is actually ::/128 > > You mean ::/0. No, I do not, actually. That would make it just a catch-all default route