On 10/10/2007, Richard Cartwright [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 10/10/07 19:24, Brian Butterworth [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
But it could be done on analogue - you could never see the join in the
switch to regional programmes on the BBC even back as far as Sixty
Minutes, so it MUST be
On 09/10/2007, Mr I Forrester [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://radar.oreilly.com/Picture%2052.html
Full story - http://radar.oreilly.com/archives/2007/09/throng_unveils.html
I saw this while browsing my rss aggregator. Seems like a decent design
for a TV Guide. I was wondering how it would
And what bugs me is when companies Microsoft (and the rest) deal with
the BBC (e.g. when the BBC included a BBC channel in the release of
IE4) and not the commercial arm (BBC Worldwide).
How is that deal any different than using Sky as a route to market for
free-at-point-of-consumption public
On 11/10/2007, Gordon Joly [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yes, this is true. And a charity can have wholly owned subsidiary
that makes profits, in much the same way.
BBC - not for profit corporation.
BBC Worldwide - a global company that makes a profit.
Gordo
At 14:09 +0100 9/10/07,
On 11/10/2007, Gordon Joly [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yes, this is true. And a charity can have wholly owned subsidiary
that makes profits, in much the same way.
BBC - not for profit corporation.
BBC Worldwide - a global company that makes a profit.
Gordo
At 14:09 +0100 9/10/07,
Hi guys,
I saw a del.icio.us post from Tom Coates earlier asking how many
people actualy *use* the iPlayer:
http://del.icio.us/url/0dfca05d2d10356af6fe9e33ecbcbc72
Which got me thinking, how many people actually use the iPlayer? Are
those sort of stats something the BBC can talk about?
Nick
At 10:25 +0100 11/10/07, Jason Cartwright wrote:
And what bugs me is when companies Microsoft (and the rest) deal with
the BBC (e.g. when the BBC included a BBC channel in the release of
IE4) and not the commercial arm (BBC Worldwide).
How is that deal any different than using Sky as a route
Well, like it or not big corps are often the gatekeepers sat between the
audience masses and content owners. That doesn't seem to be changing
(*cough* Google).
J
On 11/10/2007, Gordon Joly [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
At 10:25 +0100 11/10/07, Jason Cartwright wrote:
And what bugs me is when
On 11/10/2007, Jason Cartwright [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Well, like it or not big corps are often the gatekeepers sat between the
audience masses and content owners. That doesn't seem to be changing
(*cough* Google).
In a way it's always been true. The sellers of radios and televisions
Oooh, aaah...
ps I don't know if this has only just turned up but *thanks*
to whoever put the option not to p2p with the application
turned off which I've just noticed. Saving me from having to
kill kservice every time I'm finished watching anything is a big win.
I noticed the 5.5
At 17:12 +0100 11/10/07, Jason Cartwright wrote:
Well, like it or not big corps are often the gatekeepers sat between
the audience masses and content owners. That doesn't seem to be
changing (*cough* Google).
J
And there you have the case in point. Auntie, for better or worse, is
the best
11 matches
Mail list logo
