Tim Dobson wrote:
> The default Maemo browser is essentially Firefox 3.5+ which supports
> (not natively H.264 though, but that's a different debate).
>
> With regards to DRM, well, I think some people are generally coming
> round to the idea that it may not be the be all and end all.
>
> We'll
> On which platforms? As I said, I’m not talking about
> Windows *at all* here.
It uses an appropriate renderer for the platform, which by default would be GPU
accelerated. (I don't feel like looking up the names for each one right now
though...)
> …yes. It does it backwards. Given a focus on r
On Fri, Jan 1, 2010 at 13:19, Tim Dobson wrote:
>
> We'll have to see what happens, but it wouldn't surprise me if 2010 was
> the year video DRM got dropped as DRM for audio and in music has been in
> the last year or two...
>
>
I'm not that hopeful. I think the biggest driver behind the dropping
On Fri, Jan 1, 2010 at 13:19, Kieran Kunhya wrote:
>> a) VLC, when _not_ using the GPU, doesn’t struggle
>> remotely as much as Flash
>> b) VLC also overlays text and graphics over video
>
> Again using the GPU for compositing.
On which platforms? As I said, I’m not talking about Windows *at all*
> a) VLC, when _not_ using the GPU, doesn’t struggle
> remotely as much as Flash
> b) VLC also overlays text and graphics over video
Again using the GPU for compositing.
> c) YV12->RGB _can_ be tightly optimised if you’re
> crazy enough to do
> things that way around
>
> The key there is that th
Mo McRoberts wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 31, 2009 at 20:50, Dave Crossland wrote:
>> 2010/1/1 Tim Dobson :
>>> it was suggested initially that GNU/Linux was pretty much irrelevant
>> Only by ignorant assholes. :-)
>
> Making it a “GNU/Linux” issue misses the point, really: the OS itself
> is fairly irre
On Thu, Dec 31, 2009 at 13:25, Kieran Kunhya wrote:
>> > This is windows-only right now (presumably because
>> Apple won't give Adobe access to the necessary APIs).
>>
>> Er, what? Where did that presumption come from?
>>
>> Nothing else on the Mac or Linux has a problem with video
>> compositing.
On Thu, Dec 31, 2009 at 20:50, Dave Crossland wrote:
> 2010/1/1 Tim Dobson :
>> it was suggested initially that GNU/Linux was pretty much irrelevant
>
> Only by ignorant assholes. :-)
Making it a “GNU/Linux” issue misses the point, really: the OS itself
is fairly irrelevant, and there’s no propri
8 matches
Mail list logo
