Re: [BackupPC-users] why are full backups needed with BackupPC?

2006-03-24 Thread Les Mikesell
On Fri, 2006-03-24 at 17:56, Peter Gumeson wrote: > After looking through the backuppc code, I am under > the impression that BackupPC does not take advantage > of using the --link-dest option in Rsync to create > hardlinks. I am guessing one reason may be that the > PerlRsync module does not app

Re: [BackupPC-users] why are full backups needed with BackupPC?

2006-03-24 Thread Peter Gumeson
Doh! I see what you meant, you suggested adding link_dest to the rsync args in the config.pl Is this safe with backuppc? Peter --- Peter Gumeson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hi all, > > After looking through the backuppc code, I am under > the impression that BackupPC does not take advant

Re: [BackupPC-users] why are full backups needed with BackupPC?

2006-03-24 Thread Peter Gumeson
Hi all, After looking through the backuppc code, I am under the impression that BackupPC does not take advantage of using the --link-dest option in Rsync to create hardlinks. I am guessing one reason may be that the PerlRsync module does not appear to support the --link-dest option. (http://perl

Re: [BackupPC-users] why are full backups needed with BackupPC?

2006-03-24 Thread Les Mikesell
On Fri, 2006-03-24 at 17:21, Tomasz Chmielewski wrote: > > there are other backup schemes that do the "always make a full" thing, > > do a web search for "mike rubel rsync backup" to see one guy's web > > page that uses a similar scheme. It lacks many of the nice surrounding > > tools that backup

Re: [BackupPC-users] why are full backups needed with BackupPC?

2006-03-24 Thread Tomasz Chmielewski
Dan Pritts wrote: On Fri, Mar 24, 2006 at 05:35:12PM +0100, Tomasz Chmielewski wrote: Why are full backups needed at all with BackupPC? According to documentation, "BackupPC's CGI interface ``fills-in'' incremental backups based on the last full backup, giving every backup a ``full'' appearan

[BackupPC-users] error checking on DumpPreUserCmd

2006-03-24 Thread Matthias Bertschy
Hello, We are using Backuppc as our main backup solution for a dozen servers. One of our servers has a Perforce server, so we need to checkpoint its database before backing up (it could also be a mysqldump). Some days ago, we detected a problem on the server preventing the successful checkpoi

[BackupPC-users] examples for backups of single machines?

2006-03-24 Thread Tomasz Chmielewski
I just read what BackupPC can do, and it just seems to me it's quite a good tool, with which I could replace my own rsync/hardlink scripts. BackupPC has quite an extensive documentation, but what I failed to find are... examples. I would like to backup individual hosts, both Windows and Linux.

Re: [BackupPC-users] why are full backups needed with BackupPC?

2006-03-24 Thread Dan Pritts
On Fri, Mar 24, 2006 at 05:35:12PM +0100, Tomasz Chmielewski wrote: > Why are full backups needed at all with BackupPC? > > According to documentation, "BackupPC's CGI interface ``fills-in'' > incremental backups based on the last full backup, giving every backup a > ``full'' appearance." > > S

Re: [BackupPC-users] Tried again: got 0 bytes - backup for a large server

2006-03-24 Thread Dan Pritts
To troubleshoot this, I'd suggest you make sure that you can, with your chosen backup method, "by hand", back things up. Do by hand what backuppc is supposed to be doing. eg with rsync: srv% rsync -av -e ssh [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/share/name /some/dir/on/srv I'd also suggest starting with a smalle

Re: [BackupPC-users] why are full backups needed with BackupPC?

2006-03-24 Thread Les Mikesell
On Fri, 2006-03-24 at 11:04, Tomasz Chmielewski wrote: > > > So, in theory, it should be enough to make just one full, initial > > > backup, and then only incremental backups. > > > > > > Or do I miss something here? > > > > one reason (there may be others) is that incrementals don't accoun

Re: [BackupPC-users] why are full backups needed with BackupPC?

2006-03-24 Thread Paul Fox
> > > Why are full backups needed at all with BackupPC? > > > > > > According to documentation, "BackupPC's CGI interface ``fills-in'' > > > incremental backups based on the last full backup, giving every backup > > a > > > ``full'' appearance." > > > > > > So, in theory, it sho

Re: [BackupPC-users] why are full backups needed with BackupPC?

2006-03-24 Thread Tomasz Chmielewski
Paul Fox wrote: > Why are full backups needed at all with BackupPC? > > According to documentation, "BackupPC's CGI interface ``fills-in'' > incremental backups based on the last full backup, giving every backup a > ``full'' appearance." > > So, in theory, it should be enough to make j

Re: [BackupPC-users] why are full backups needed with BackupPC?

2006-03-24 Thread Paul Fox
> Why are full backups needed at all with BackupPC? > > According to documentation, "BackupPC's CGI interface ``fills-in'' > incremental backups based on the last full backup, giving every backup a > ``full'' appearance." > > So, in theory, it should be enough to make just one full, init

[BackupPC-users] why are full backups needed with BackupPC?

2006-03-24 Thread Tomasz Chmielewski
Why are full backups needed at all with BackupPC? According to documentation, "BackupPC's CGI interface ``fills-in'' incremental backups based on the last full backup, giving every backup a ``full'' appearance." So, in theory, it should be enough to make just one full, initial backup, and th

Re: [BackupPC-users] examples for backups of single machines?

2006-03-24 Thread Tomasz Chmielewski
Tomasz Chmielewski wrote: I just read what BackupPC can do, and it just seems to me it's quite a good tool, with which I could replace my own rsync/hardlink scripts. BackupPC has quite an extensive documentation, but what I failed to find are... examples. I would like to backup individual ho