Tomasz writes:
> Is BackupPC 3.0 capable of transferring different UTF-8 characters, like
> German umlauts, using cygwin-rsyncd 2.6.8_0 available on BackupPC
> download site (running on Windows)?
Yes.
> Or is it still needed to use a patched cygwin1.dll version, containing
> UTF-8 hacks - lik
Jacob writes:
> I am running BackupPC 2.1.2pl2. I have a problem that I cannot queue
> multiple restores. I request a direct restore of a users files, and that
> job qoes into the queue. I then request another restore while the first
> one is running. I get a message:
>
> but a job is currently r
What about using 2 BackupPC servers. Split all the backups over two
physical servers. 1 server does 100 PC's the other server does the other
100.
James Ward wrote:
> In an effort to reduce the time spent doing the BackupPC_nightly, I
> upped the number done in parallel from 2 to 8. Now the s
On Sun, 2006-10-29 at 12:19, James Ward wrote:
> In an effort to reduce the time spent doing the BackupPC_nightly, I
> upped the number done in parallel from 2 to 8. Now the system is 99%
> wait. What is the best mix, half wait and half CPU bound?
Disk head motion is bound to be the bottlene
In an effort to reduce the time spent doing the BackupPC_nightly, I
upped the number done in parallel from 2 to 8. Now the system is 99%
wait. What is the best mix, half wait and half CPU bound?
I'm concerned about performance because I am backing up over 200
machines and so far, I'm only
On Sun, 2006-10-29 at 09:38, Tomasz Chmielewski wrote:
> >
> >>> Out of curiosity how long did it take and how big was the entire data
> >>> size on the first run? did it eat up all the cpu time when running?
> >> As I remember, it took a couple of hours; but I was copying from one HDD
> >> to a
Les Mikesell wrote:
> On Sun, 2006-10-29 at 04:13, Tomasz Chmielewski wrote:
>
>>> Out of curiosity how long did it take and how big was the entire data
>>> size on the first run? did it eat up all the cpu time when running?
>> As I remember, it took a couple of hours; but I was copying from one
On Sun, 2006-10-29 at 04:13, Tomasz Chmielewski wrote:
> > Out of curiosity how long did it take and how big was the entire data
> > size on the first run? did it eat up all the cpu time when running?
>
> As I remember, it took a couple of hours; but I was copying from one HDD
> to another.
> I
Les Stott wrote:
I know of people who do it; but they're doing it on machines with more
memory and fewer files.
>> Just add lots of swap.
>>
>> I was able to rsync an archive with several million files on a machine
>> with just 256 MB RAM; it had several gigabytes of swap.
>>
>>> I know of people who do it; but they're doing it on machines with more
>>> memory and fewer files.
>>>
>
> Just add lots of swap.
>
> I was able to rsync an archive with several million files on a machine
> with just 256 MB RAM; it had several gigabytes of swap.
>
>
>
Out of curiosi
Rodrigo Real wrote:
> Carl Wilhelm Soderstrom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>> On 10/28 10:23 , Rodrigo Real wrote:
>>> Can't you install rsync on 10.0.0.254? That should be the easiest way,
>>> rsync can preserve hard links with the -H option, additionally it
>>> would transfer only the differenc
11 matches
Mail list logo
