Good morning to all,
Now that release for version 3.0 has been done, I want to change version. But I
have doubts about what should be update method ?
I have backuppc running (version 2.x) on computer and many backups existing.
Should I follow standard installation as mentioned in document
Timothy J. Massey wrote:
> for ( my $i = 0 ; ; $i++ ) {
> $reqFileName = "archiveReq.$$.$i";
> last if ( !-f "$TopDir/pc/$archivehost/$reqFileName" );
> }
>
> The last digit is generated by loop to the first digit that doesn't
> already ex
Dan writes:
> I was wrong - the nightly e-mails were in fact sent.
>
> However, the nightly e-mails were wrong/incomplete/misleading.
> I guess this falls under a feature request.
It's a bug. Missed backups due to the disk being too full are never
included in the admin nightly email. Thanks fo
BackupPC 3.0.0 has been released on SF.net (finally). This
release has quite a few new features, including:
* New configuration and host CGI editor.
* Rsync hardlink support (needs latest File::RsyncP).
* Decoupled BackupPC_dump from BackupPC_nightly.
* Support for multi-level
Hello!
Here are some notes on how to submit an archive job to BackupPC in the
same way that the GUI does. This can be used via cron, etc., yet will
still be logged and visible from the GUI.
In Googling ways to archive via cron, the only items I've found used
individual BackuPC_archiveHost com
Hello!
In digging into the archive system, I have a question:
Is there a reason why archives made with "-1" as the backup number are
saved as "-1" instead of the actual backup number that was used? If
not, would you accept a patch that changes it to use the actual backup
number instead (assum
dbp lists wrote:
> I've been happily using backuppc for about a month now. I love it.
> I've had to format a computer and the restore worked great.
>
> However, I've noticed that newly created files in newly created
> directories are not backed up during incremental backups. (only
> during full
brien dieterle wrote:
> Has anyone tried using mdns//bonjour for clients? Macs have it enabled
> by default, most linux distros have it, although not enabled, and you
> can download it for Windows... Then you wouldn't have to do anything
> special; they'd be normal dns lookups-- fred.local, et
Has anyone tried using mdns//bonjour for clients? Macs have it enabled
by default, most linux distros have it, although not enabled, and you
can download it for Windows... Then you wouldn't have to do anything
special; they'd be normal dns lookups-- fred.local, etc.
brien
James Kyle wrote:
>
Hi,
Ted To wrote on 23.01.2007 at 10:06:15 and on 27.01.2007 at 19:08:37
[[BackupPC-users] Backuppc host discovery for linux computers]:
> Reading the documenation on host discovery, it's not clear to me how to set
> up my network so that backuppc knows what dhcp assigned IP address to
> associat
I've been happily using backuppc for about a month now. I love it.
I've had to format a computer and the restore worked great.
However, I've noticed that newly created files in newly created
directories are not backed up during incremental backups. (only
during full backups). Is this the way it
I could be off, I'm pretty new to backuppc myself. From what I
understand though, backuppc uses nmblookup, which means you have to
be running smb services on the clients...in my case windows file
services on mac.
I didn't like the idea of running smb solely for backuppc, so I used
static d
12 matches
Mail list logo
