Simon writes:
> I get the following error message "ibdata1: md4 doesn't match: will
> retry in phase 1; file removed" for this file in my Xfer Log. Its file
> size is about 50GB and it could be that the file is modified while the
> backup is running. My version of BackupPC is a Ubuntu package whic
Vasan writes:
> For the next backup, it always seems to check for any modifications
> during the last 24 hours. If for example, the next days nightly job
> takes only a minute to complete (8:01PM), then first it will check if
> any backup has been done for the last 24 hours at 8:01PM itself. In
>
Vasan wrote:
> For the next backup, it always seems to check for any modifications
> during the last 24 hours. If for example, the next days nightly job
> takes only a minute to complete (8:01PM), then first it will check if
> any backup has been done for the last 24 hours at 8:01PM itself. In
> th
Jamie writes:
> I have a fresh install of Backuppc 3 up and running on a centos box.
> We're mainly backing up Apple Xserves.
>
> It's backing 2 of them up sucessfully. But on one of them it will do
> the full backup no problem but when it runs incramentals it keeps
> giving me this error.
>
> B
Howdy ya'll. I'm using rsyncd as the transport mechanism for BackupPC
3.0.0, and the backup is finishing fine, but lots of files and folders
are giving me errors such as:
Remote[1]: rsync: opendir "/lost+found" (in root) failed: Permission
denied (13)
My rsyncd on the system that I am trying
Holger writes:
> I'm not sure whether rsyncd authentication is more than a plaintext
> password exchange though.
It uses a random challenge/response with md4 digests.
Like any system like this, weak passwords are vulnerable to
dictionary attacks. But if you use a decent (high entropy)
password
Vasan wrote:
> We have scheduled backups for every day to be at 8:00PM in the evening
> for one server host that has around 300GB in full to be backed up.
How did you schedule this? Normally you tell backuppc when *not* to do
backups with the blackout period and let it decide when to start each
Hi all,
We have scheduled backups for every day to be at 8:00PM in the evening
for one server host that has around 300GB in full to be backed up.
However, because of the innovative pooling mechanisms, it is clear
that the entire 300 GB is not getting backed up daily by backuppc as
per our expectat
I have a fresh install of Backuppc 3 up and running on a centos box.
We're mainly backing up Apple Xserves.
It's backing 2 of them up sucessfully. But on one of them it will do
the full backup no problem but when it runs incramentals it keeps
giving me this error.
Backup failed on nhsxserv.newber
Hi,
Oriol de los Santos wrote on 13.04.2007 at 18:45:51 [[BackupPC-users] Using
BackupPC with rsync but with conections initiated by the clients]:
> I've been reading the documentation for BackupPC and it seems that the only
> way to use rsync is to have the BackupPC server initiate the conectio
Krsnendu dasa wrote:
> 1. What is parity? What are the parity files for and How do you use
> them with the archives?
>
See http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Parchive.
Basically if one of the archive files has some corruption, and it's not
too much, then the parity files will allow you to recover fr
I've been reading the documentation for BackupPC and it seems that the only
way to use rsync is to have the BackupPC server initiate the conections with
the clients (which from my point of view is a bit of a security issue).
In my case I would be interested in having the client initiate the cone
Hi all,
I get the following error message "ibdata1: md4 doesn't match: will
retry in phase 1; file removed" for this file in my Xfer Log. Its file
size is about 50GB and it could be that the file is modified while the
backup is running. My version of BackupPC is a Ubuntu package which says
3.0.0-2
yes,
but helps you backup files of SQLserver and Exchange. You do not need to backup
everything
with such a tool,but only the file, you cannnot access.
regards
Hinnack
>reply to message:
>date: 16.04.2007 13:07:02
>from: "Holger Parplies" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>to: "Henrik Genssen" <[EMAIL PROTEC
> > you may try [...] that does a backup of windows into one file
> > (even non accessable files). Afterwards backup that file with backupPC.
> ... thus totally defeating the advantages of pooling.
For a similar solution on Windows > XP platforms, that gets around the problem
of destroying pooli
Hi,
Henrik Genssen wrote on 16.04.2007 at 08:59:33 [Re: [BackupPC-users] vmware
windows problem]:
> you may try [...] that does a backup of windows into one file
> (even non accessable files). Afterwards backup that file with backupPC.
... thus totally defeating the advantages of pooling.
Regar
Hi,
you may try drive snapshot (http://www.drivesnapshot.de/) Shareware 39,- EUR
that does a backup of windows into one file
(even non accessable files). Afterwards backup that file with backupPC.
greetings
Hinnack
>reply to message:
>date: 15.04.2007 19:49:22
>from: "Travis Fraser" <[EMAIL PR
17 matches
Mail list logo
