I would suspect that the biggest issue you will have is all the backups that
were being done are incomplete. if your system was in the middle of backups
then the nightly wasn't running so you shouldn't have any hardlink issues.
Just do backups(fulls would be best) on all the clients that show a pa
Could you try changing the value of:
$Conf{BackupZeroFilesIsFatal} = 1;
to 0?
-Nathan
On Thu, Feb 21, 2008 at 9:29 PM, Bruno Faria <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi, I'm using tar to backup a couple of linux servers. The problem is that
> I'm getting the error: backup failed (No files dumped for
Interesting info here, I have never run into this because I use tar to
retrieve any large restores and zip for the small stuff.
On Wed, Feb 20, 2008 at 11:56 PM, Mirco Piccin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi and thanks for reply.
>
> > > On server i have ext3 fs, and in this case on client i have
I didn't see quite the full answer to this in the archives, but please
forgive me if I managed to just miss it somewhere.
I recently woke up to the sound of my UPS alarms going off, and managed
to just get to the system (due to an unfortunate and off-topic series of
mishaps) in time to see the bat
Hi, I'm using tar to backup a couple of linux servers. The problem is that
I'm getting the error: backup failed (No files dumped for share
/someDirectory) for certain machines. I did a google search on this error
and it seems like a lot of people got this before but I could not find any
solutions.
I'm one of those people who use the RAID system for replicating data for
offsite backup. It works, but is a kludge.
I've just discovered a newly released project that has piqued my
interest as a possible replacement. It is called Zumastor and looks
like it might be an efficient system for blo
Curtis Preston wrote:
> Hey, folks! It's W. Curtis Preston, the author of Backup & Recovery and
> the webmaster of www.backupcentral.com.
>
> I'd like to add the backuppc-users list to the backup software mailing
> lists that I support on BackupCentral.com. I added the NetWorker,
> NetBackup, a
Curtis writes:
> Hey, folks! It's W. Curtis Preston, the author of Backup & Recovery and
> the webmaster of www.backupcentral.com.
>
> I'd like to add the backuppc-users list to the backup software mailing
> lists that I support on BackupCentral.com. I added the NetWorker,
> NetBackup, and TSM
This is not the message you are looking for. Move along. ;)
+--
|This was sent by [EMAIL PROTECTED] via Backup Central.
|Forward SPAM to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
+--
Hey, folks! It's W. Curtis Preston, the author of Backup & Recovery and
the webmaster of www.backupcentral.com.
I'd like to add the backuppc-users list to the backup software mailing
lists that I support on BackupCentral.com. I added the NetWorker,
NetBackup, and TSM lists a year ago with great
Hello,
| Could somebody give me (total newbie) a short howto for
| installing the Nagios-Plugin "check_backuppc"
| (http://n-backuppc.sourceforge.net/)
|
| Running System: Debian-Etch; Apache2; Nagios 1.4.
not tested (yet), but just take a look at README & INSTALL provided with
the pack
David Rees wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 21, 2008 at 11:43 AM, Nick Webb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Rich Rauenzahn wrote:
>
> As Rich said, BackupPC's rsync modules don't support compression. SSH
> compression should work fine, though.
>
> -Dave
>
Yeah, but ssh compression isn't working for me either
Nick Webb wrote:
> Rich Rauenzahn wrote:
>> dan wrote:
>>> no, incrementals are more efficient on bandwidth. they do a less
>>> strenuous test to determine if a file has changed.
>>>
>>> at the expense of CPU power on both sides, you can compress the rsync
>>> traffic either with rsync -z
>> H
On Thu, Feb 21, 2008 at 11:43 AM, Nick Webb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Rich Rauenzahn wrote:
> > dan wrote:
> >> no, incrementals are more efficient on bandwidth. they do a less
> >> strenuous test to determine if a file has changed.
> >>
> >> at the expense of CPU power on both sides, you
Rich Rauenzahn wrote:
>
> dan wrote:
>> no, incrementals are more efficient on bandwidth. they do a less
>> strenuous test to determine if a file has changed.
>>
>> at the expense of CPU power on both sides, you can compress the rsync
>> traffic either with rsync -z
> Have you tried rsync -z?
Hello list,
I have installed BackupPC some months ago, and I have noticed that the
users never receive email notifications of problems.
I have found where the problem comes from.
My installation of BackupPC is configured to use the french language :
$Conf{Language} = 'fr';
When BackupPC wants to
16 matches
Mail list logo
