Krsnendu writes:
> I want to exclude the directory which contains vmware virtual machines.
> I have tried to exclude it on my localhost computer and on my windows
> laptop. But both of them are still trying to backup the directory I
> want to exclude.
>
> Have I used the wrong formatting?
>
> I
Les Mikesell wrote:
> Mark Sopuch wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> When I run rsync manually from either direction of our WAN link to
>> our remote office without the --server --sender options the copy
>> works fine but when I allow BackupPC to do it's thing using --server
>> --sender it reports the followin
Have you tried a backslash escape character in front of the space in
'Virtual Machines'? I know single quote might take care of this, but just a
guess.
Also, adding a /* ?
Stabbing in the dark here.
-Nathan
> In the config file it looks like this:
>
> $Conf{BackupFilesExclude} = {
> '/home/kr
I want to exclude the directory which contains vmware virtual machines.
I have tried to exclude it on my localhost computer and on my windows
laptop. But both of them are still trying to backup the directory I
want to exclude.
Have I used the wrong formatting?
I have searched the archives, but I
On Tue, Feb 26, 2008 at 4:39 PM, David Rees <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> So there you go. IMO, unless you are willing to overhaul your storage
> system or slightly increase the risk of data corruption (IMO,
> data=writeback instead of the default data=ordered should be a large
> gain for you an
On Tue, Feb 26, 2008 at 2:23 PM, Tomasz Chmielewski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Can you give us more details on your disk array? Controller, disks,
> > RAID layout, ext3 fs creation options, etc...
>
> I said some of that already - but here are some missing parts.
> 5x 400 MB HDD (WDC WD4000
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Tomasz Chmielewski wrote:
| Les Mikesell schrieb:
|> Tomasz Chmielewski wrote:
|>> Although - with IO::Dirent "wa" is now 100% almost all the time, and
|>> the system feels much slower. Hm. Let's hope it's coincidence, and
|>> assume the system was ju
Tomasz Chmielewski wrote:
>
> I indeed use iSCSI.
> The storage is on the SAN, and it's accessible via iSCSI.
> BackupPC itself runs as a Xen guest.
Is there some point to splitting the box where backuppc runs and its
storage? I'd expect it to be faster/cheaper to shove some big SATA
drives in
Les Mikesell schrieb:
> Tomasz Chmielewski wrote:
>>
>> Although - with IO::Dirent "wa" is now 100% almost all the time, and
>> the system feels much slower. Hm. Let's hope it's coincidence, and
>> assume the system was just committing a big write...
>
> Is this on a raid5? There's a lot of ext
David Rees schrieb:
(...)
>> I guess enabling write cache would help a lot, as then, the storage
>> could commit the changes out of order (less seek) - but I don't trust it
>> much.
>
> Where would you be enabling the write cache? It looks like you are
> using iscsi (I'm not familar with it m
Tomasz Chmielewski wrote:
>
> Although - with IO::Dirent "wa" is now 100% almost all the time, and the
> system feels much slower. Hm. Let's hope it's coincidence, and assume
> the system was just committing a big write...
Is this on a raid5? There's a lot of extra work involved for small
upda
On Tue, Feb 26, 2008 at 2:07 AM, Tomasz Chmielewski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> But I didn't have IO::Dirent installed, thanks for the hint. Let's hope
> the list of directories in "trash" will keep decreasing now. Right now,
> I have almost 100 directories there, and it is growing each day a b
I'd like to bring this topic back into discussion. I'm trying to keep a
single daily full. To also save on bandwidth, I run a full, and then I
run a daily incremental. I'd like to just merge each days incremental
into the full. Craig, below you discuss that in 3.0+ you were considering
changing
Mark Sopuch wrote:
> Hi,
>
> When I run rsync manually from either direction of our WAN link to our
> remote office without the --server --sender options the copy works fine
> but when I allow BackupPC to do it's thing using --server --sender it
> reports the following error without performing
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> I would like to know if it's possible to use the XferMethod : Rsync over
> SSH with certificate over internet ?
> Thanks to answer me if it's possible (or not) and how to process.
Yes, that's the normal way of doing it and there is nothing special
about going over th
Paul Archer schrieb:
> 11:17am, Tomasz Chmielewski wrote:
>
>> Why should any filesystem perform seeks better (when writing) than any
>> other filesystem?
>>
>> I imagine it could be true only if:
>>
>> - kernel would cache a large amount of writes
>> - kernel would commit these writes not in a FI
11:17am, Tomasz Chmielewski wrote:
> Why should any filesystem perform seeks better (when writing) than any
> other filesystem?
>
> I imagine it could be true only if:
>
> - kernel would cache a large amount of writes
> - kernel would commit these writes not in a FIFO manner, but whenever it
> see
Hello,
I would like to know if it's possible to use the XferMethod : Rsync over
SSH with certificate over internet ?
Thanks to answer me if it's possible (or not) and how to process.
Thanks a lot.
Regards,
Romain
SC2N -S.A Siège Social : 2, Rue Andre Boulle - 94000 Créteil - 327 153
722 RCS
Everyone,
I am trying to generate an automatic e-mail when a backup is completed
(successful or not).
I have modified the mailsend.sh script (posted elsewhere, I believe) to try to
send me the last 20 lines of the most recent file XferLOG.XXX.z (where XXX is
the backup number) or XferLOG.bad.z
Hello all,
I need to do a full backup every Monday at 3AM.
I saw in the log that when the full backup has been interrupted, cause
the backup disk is not on line, that the full (for instance) is pending
and is executed when the backup disk is on line normal but the next full
doesn't begin next
dan schrieb:
(...)
> I suggest you try reiserfs and see how it treats you. running linux,
> you dont really have any other options other than ext3, reiserfs, or
> xfs. zfs is very very good at small files and hardlink operations but
> would need to run on fuse on linux and you would likely s
David Rees schrieb:
> On Mon, Feb 25, 2008 at 1:23 AM, Tomasz Chmielewski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Unfortunately, it doesn't scale very well in terms of performance - you
>> may see this thread on linux-fsdevel list for more info:
>> http://marc.info/?t=12033398513&r=2&w=4
>
> What ver
Hi,
When I run rsync manually from either direction of our WAN link to our
remote office without the --server --sender options the copy works fine
but when I allow BackupPC to do it's thing using --server --sender it
reports the following error without performing the backup:
full backup starte
23 matches
Mail list logo
