Hi,
Chris Robertson wrote on 2008-08-01 10:30:19 -0800 [Re: [BackupPC-users]
archive problem]:
> The are "file test operators". See
> http://tldp.org/LDP/abs/html/fto.html for a pretty extensive (and
> annotated) list.
without wanting to be too pedantic, I think it should be pointed out that
Holger Parplies wrote:
>>> specifically, write speed is less that half
>>> that of a raid1 and way less than a raid0+1.
>
> I would find interesting what kind of setup you get that sort of performance
> with (hardware or software RAID, disk speed, number of spindles, RAM size,
> $Conf{MaxBackup
Hi,
Diederik De Deckere wrote on 2008-08-08 16:43:54 +0200 [Re: [BackupPC-users]
Move BackupPC]:
> Op 8-aug-08, om 16:01 heeft Daniel Denson het volgende geschreven:
> > you should start a new thread instead of hijacking an existing one.
>
> Sorry, I didn't know. Google didn't gave me any hits
Rich Rauenzahn wrote:
>
>
> I'm using RAID5 at home across 4x500GB drives to backup our home
> machines and another across the internet. Space efficiency was
> more important to me than speed and I don't have any problems using
> RAID5. So it really depends on your use case and priorities.
Diederik De Deckere wrote:
anyway. you should consider NOT moving to raid5 as it is very very
slow with backuppc. specifically, write speed is less that half
that of a raid1 and way less than a raid0+1.
I'm not sure if speed is an issue here since all backups are taken
over night.
Hi all,
I'm looking for a way to exclude large files from a remote site backup
via rsync. The problem is that users sometime forget the online backup
of the server and copy some large files which cannot be remotely backup.
I cannot filter by extension and I would like to use the --maxsize
opti
Op 8-aug-08, om 16:01 heeft Daniel Denson het volgende geschreven:
> you should start a new thread instead of hijacking an existing one.
>
Sorry, I didn't know. Google didn't gave me any hits so I asked it
here.
> anyway. you should consider NOT moving to raid5 as it is very very
> slow wi
you should start a new thread instead of hijacking an existing one.
anyway. you should consider NOT moving to raid5 as it is very very slow
with backuppc. specifically, write speed is less that half that of a
raid1 and way less than a raid0+1.
Sam Przyswa wrote:
Holger Parplies a écrit :
