-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Msquared wrote:
On Sun, Sep 28, 2008 at 08:02:56AM -0400, Andrei Stebakov wrote:
Now it looks like every incremental backup is not different from a full
backup as it takes almost the same space on disk as a full backup. I
thought it should only
On Sun, Sep 28, 2008 at 08:02:56AM -0400, Andrei Stebakov wrote:
Now it looks like every incremental backup is not different from a full
backup as it takes almost the same space on disk as a full backup. I
thought it should only backup the delta...
I think that while a delta is backed up,
On Sat, Oct 04, 2008 at 12:02:29AM -0500, Terri Kelley wrote:
I have had a backup running successfully running of a server for some
time. It uses automysqlbackup. Looking at the directory where that is
stored on the server to be backed up, that is still being executed by
BackupPC.
On Tue,
On Mon, Oct 06, 2008 at 09:33:42AM -0400, Andrei Stebakov wrote:
Dan, but what's wrong in having BackupPC on the Web server as long as
it's doing the backup to a different partition, allocated only for
backup?
If the web server is hacked, the backup is at risk. If the backup is on a
host in
On Tue, Oct 7, 2008 at 12:54 PM, Nick Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
one thing i use that i recently figured out is the lsof command in
linux, it lists all the open files that the system has open.
so i run a command like lsof | grep /storage/backuppc and it will list
all the files currently
I am using the volume shadow copy to backup large (12gig+) sql db's.
After the first full backup, and things are changed/added to the DB,
is it going to pull down the entire DB again or will it just download
the changes
(if thats possible)
thanks for the input.
On Thu, Oct 9, 2008 at 11:06 AM, Nick Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am using the volume shadow copy to backup large (12gig+) sql db's.
After the first full backup, and things are changed/added to the DB,
is it going to pull down the entire DB again or will it just download
the changes
(if
Do you know how it does that? I thought it just checked checksums to
see if they were different? How can it just download the changes to a
large DB like that if its all contained in a single file DB?
thanks
On Thu, Oct 9, 2008 at 3:38 PM, David Rees [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, Oct 9, 2008
Hi all:
I have a couple of systems with shares (/var/bak) that generate 12GB
of data/day. the usual retention schedule keeps a:
daily backup for 2 weeks,
weekly backups for 4 weeks,
monthly backups for 5 months
For this /var/bak data we really don't need 2 weeks of daily
backups. One
On 10/09 08:43 , John Rouillard wrote:
For this /var/bak data we really don't need 2 weeks of daily
backups. One week is fine, but other data on the system does need this
2 week buffer.
snip
In any case using the current implementation, will this work?
create a new host and use the
10 matches
Mail list logo