I must say Glassfox, I have never seen Holger get upset with someone on-list
like this. Please change your post methods for our sake.
On Mon, Dec 22, 2008 at 6:53 PM, Holger Parplies wrote:
> Hi Glassfox,
>
> since you're ignoring off-list requests to stop posting to this *mailing
> list*
> via
How dangerous is it to run xfs without write barriers?
On 12/22/08, Chris Robertson wrote:
> dan wrote:
>> I guess that updatedb thing reinforces my arguement about not seeing
>> any mixed load tests. ext3 handles these situations pretty good,
>> maybe XFS does not...
>
> Write barriers really h
Hi,
Les Mikesell wrote on 2008-12-22 11:53:05 -0600 [Re: [BackupPC-users] First
user problems]:
> Carl Wilhelm Soderstrom wrote:
> > On 12/20 04:29 , cantthinkofanickname wrote:
> >> But if I do that do I now have to go round to every Windows PC I need to
> >> backup and install something. I thou
Hi Glassfox,
since you're ignoring off-list requests to stop posting to this *mailing list*
via "Backup Central", let me explain to you on-list, that this is a
MAILING LIST (shouting intended), and that you are making an utter fool of
yourself by repeatedly generating messages containing
Glassfox
I'm pretty excited (as exited as one gets about filesystems) with the nexgen
filesystems that are progressing. btfs looks to be a very good concept and
I hope that translated to a very good filesystem.
Im glad to hear that reiserfs4 is continuing, though I think they may want
to change the name a
Though I prefer rsync for all clients including windows clients, it should
be said that SMB has far less CPU overhead than rsync and in some
circumstances will be many many times faster. That CPU overhead can add
more seconds than it takes to transfer the whole file. There are many other
benefits
Hello everyone,
We'd like to announce the release of BackupPC Community Edition
v3.1.1. We've decided to make a release that includes patches
that the community has provided in addition to other bug fixes.
The packages and source tar ball is available at
http://www.zmanda.com/download-backuppc.
dan wrote:
> I guess that updatedb thing reinforces my arguement about not seeing
> any mixed load tests. ext3 handles these situations pretty good,
> maybe XFS does not...
Write barriers really harmed XFS performance on my setup (16 Seagate
ES.2 spindles attached to an Adaptec 51645 utilizin
This is an edited version of a previous post
Hi folks,
I tried a complete restore on my localhost (which also runs BackupPC) today and
got a lot of error messages like this:
"2008-12-22 21:54:23 localhost: File::RsyncP::FileList::encode: missing rdev on
device file dev/initctl"
Any i
Hi folks,
I tried a complete restore on my localhost (which also runs BackupPC) today and
got a lot of error messages like this:
"2008-12-22 21:54:23 localhost: File::RsyncP::FileList::encode: missing rdev on
device file dev/initctl"
Any idea what's wrong here?
I have Ubuntu system and write
Carl Wilhelm Soderstrom wrote:
> On 12/21 10:35 , Johan Ehnberg wrote:
>> Jeffrey J. Kosowsky wrote:
>>> Johan Ehnberg wrote at about 16:54:48 +0200 on Friday, December 19, 2008:
>>> It is in 3.1.0 at least - I use it all the time.
>> Can you tell me how you got it? Which package are you using? Or
Carl Wilhelm Soderstrom wrote:
> On 12/20 04:29 , cantthinkofanickname wrote:
>> But if I do that do I now have to go round to every Windows PC I need to
>> backup and install something. I thought the idea of SMB was to avoid that
>> stage. Maybe I'm wrong here?
>>
>> Any particular reason that I s
cantthinkofanickname wrote on
12/20/2008 04:15:35 AM:
> But if I do that do I now have to go round to every Windows PC I
> need to backup and install something. I thought the idea of SMB was
> to avoid that stage. Maybe I'm wrong here?
>
> Any particular reason that I should abandon SMB?
Myr
On 12/21 10:35 , Johan Ehnberg wrote:
> Jeffrey J. Kosowsky wrote:
> > Johan Ehnberg wrote at about 16:54:48 +0200 on Friday, December 19, 2008:
> > It is in 3.1.0 at least - I use it all the time.
> Can you tell me how you got it? Which package are you using? Or vanilla
> install from sf.net? I'd
On 12/20 04:29 , cantthinkofanickname wrote:
> But if I do that do I now have to go round to every Windows PC I need to
> backup and install something. I thought the idea of SMB was to avoid that
> stage. Maybe I'm wrong here?
>
> Any particular reason that I should abandon SMB?
Because rsync onl
Hi,
Jeffrey J. Kosowsky wrote on 2008-12-21 22:50:46 -0500 [Re: [BackupPC-users]
Client initiated backups, input wanted]:
> Johan Ehnberg wrote at about 22:35:19 +0200 on Sunday, December 21, 2008:
> > Jeffrey J. Kosowsky wrote:
> > > Johan Ehnberg wrote at about 16:54:48 +0200 on Friday, Decem
16 matches
Mail list logo
