-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Peter Wright wrote:
> Okay, in that case I think I've completely and utterly misunderstood
> what a full backup is in backuppc terminology (and the difference to
> an "incremental" backup).
>
> I may have to resort to reading the documentation and/or
On 23/01 16:35:09, Adam Goryachev wrote:
> Peter Wright wrote:
> > My key issue is that if I'm interested in bandwidth minimisation above
> > all else, why would I want to do anything other than
> > incremental-since-the-most-recent-previous-incremental, regardless
> > of the "level" concept?
>
>
Peter Wright wrote:
>
> What I was thinking is that if my highest priority was minimising
> bandwidth per backup, why shouldn't I be able to configure backuppc to
> *only* do incrementals and consider them all to be the same "level"?
>
>
> But I suspect I've probably misunderstood one or more ke
I think I figured it out. I created a backup host called "home_user1" but then
in the backup settings configuration for the host set ClientNameAlias to the
hostname of the backup server. This seems to work.
+--
|This was sent b
On 21/01 14:44:36, Holger Parplies wrote:
> Tino Schwarze wrote on 2009-01-21 10:48:50 +0100 [Re: [BackupPC-users]
> Designing a BackupPC install over a WAN -?minimising Full backups]:
> > On Wed, Jan 21, 2009 at 02:08:31PM +0900, Peter Wright wrote:
> > > Adam Goryachev, Wed, Jan 21 2009, 14:01:1
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Peter Wright wrote:
> On 21/01 10:48:50, Tino Schwarze wrote:
>> On Wed, Jan 21, 2009 at 02:08:31PM +0900, Peter Wright wrote:
An incremental backup will transfer changed data from the
previous full or incremental of a lower level.
>>> Can ba
On 21/01 10:48:50, Tino Schwarze wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 21, 2009 at 02:08:31PM +0900, Peter Wright wrote:
> > > An incremental backup will transfer changed data from the
> > > previous full or incremental of a lower level.
> >
> > Can backuppc be configured to transfer changed data from the previous
http://www.backupcentral.com/phpBB2/two-way-mirrors-of-external-mailing-lists-3/backuppc-21/advice-on-creating-duplicate-backup-server-94647/
+--
|This was sent by sab...@gmail.com via Backup Central.
|Forward SPAM to ab...@backu
So now that I seem to have backuppc working for my local servers to a
local backuppc server, I want to send those backups to a remote
offsite server. The offsite server I have leased and do not have
physical access to. So the question here is how best to do it.
Do I install backuppc on that
I have access to a NAS only over NFS to my backup server that I want to backup
using the tar "xfer" method. I want the per host level control (e.g. schedule)
for individual top level directories rather than have a single schedule for the
backup server with multiple shares (top level directories
Adam and Rob,
Thanks for the help...
On Jan 22, 2009, at 6:31 PM, Adam Goryachev wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Terri Kelley wrote:
>> On Jan 22, 2009, at 12:14 PM, Rob Owens wrote:
>>
>>> On Wed, Jan 21, 2009 at 10:15:43PM -0600, Terri Kelley wrote:
>>> You se
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Terri Kelley wrote:
> On Jan 22, 2009, at 12:14 PM, Rob Owens wrote:
>
>> On Wed, Jan 21, 2009 at 10:15:43PM -0600, Terri Kelley wrote:
>>> Ok, apparently I am particularly dense tonight. I have had the
>>> following error when setting up a host:
>>>
On Thu, Jan 22, 2009 at 01:39:34PM -0600, Terri Kelley wrote:
>
> On Jan 22, 2009, at 12:14 PM, Rob Owens wrote:
>
> > On Wed, Jan 21, 2009 at 10:15:43PM -0600, Terri Kelley wrote:
> >> Ok, apparently I am particularly dense tonight. I have had the
> >> following error when setting up a host:
> >
On Jan 22, 2009, at 12:14 PM, Rob Owens wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 21, 2009 at 10:15:43PM -0600, Terri Kelley wrote:
>> Ok, apparently I am particularly dense tonight. I have had the
>> following error when setting up a host:
>>
>>> Remote[1]: rsync: push_dir#3 "/home/backuppc/15" failed: No such
>>>
On Wed, Jan 21, 2009 at 10:15:43PM -0600, Terri Kelley wrote:
> Ok, apparently I am particularly dense tonight. I have had the
> following error when setting up a host:
>
> > Remote[1]: rsync: push_dir#3 "/home/backuppc/15" failed: No such file
> > or directory (2)
> > Remote[1]: rsync error: er
On Thu, Jan 22, 2009 at 12:53 PM, Nick Smith wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 22, 2009 at 11:52 AM, Les Mikesell wrote:
>> Nick Smith wrote:
>>> >
>>> Im using volume shadow to back up the databases, so they are not live.
>>> (or in use)
>>
>> Is there some reason to think the database is in a consistent sta
On Thu, Jan 22, 2009 at 11:52 AM, Les Mikesell wrote:
> Nick Smith wrote:
>> >
>> Im using volume shadow to back up the databases, so they are not live.
>> (or in use)
>
> Is there some reason to think the database is in a consistent state when
> the volume shadow is made?
>
>From what i know abo
Nick Smith wrote:
> >
> Im using volume shadow to back up the databases, so they are not live.
> (or in use)
Is there some reason to think the database is in a consistent state when
the volume shadow is made?
--
Les Mikesell
lesmikes...@gmail.com
I had that problem with a couple client servers that i back up, i
added an exclude in the
web interface that skips them,
for they key i added *
and for the BackupFilesExclude i used /Documents and Settings/*/Local
Settings/Temporary Internet Files
i also added another one for /Documents and Setting
On Wed, Jan 14, 2009 at 9:09 AM, Jeffrey J. Kosowsky
wrote:
> Kevin Kimani wrote at about 11:21:44 +0300 on Wednesday, January 14, 2009:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > Have been trying to use the script posted for copying open files in windows
> > but have not been able to fully make it run. Could someon
On Thu, Jan 22, 2009 at 9:12 AM, Les Mikesell wrote:
> Nick Smith wrote:
>>
>> in the host summary under that backup client, the "new files" says
>> size 4427.8 comp/mb 777.0 comp 82.5%
>> thats a heck of a compression ratio. i know that sql dbs can compress
>> down nicely, but im comparing t
Hi folks:
Please feel free to ignore the email I sent that started:
On Thu, Jan 22, 2009 at 02:54:20PM +, John Rouillard wrote:
> I am running release 3.1.0 of BackupPC.
>
> Is there a way in the web interface to see which hosts have never been
> backed up? I have looked at the Status and th
Hi all:
I am running release 3.1.0 of BackupPC.
Is there a way in the web interface to see which hosts have never been
backed up? I have looked at the Status and the Host Summary pages and
don't see a list of servers that were never backed up.
Also it might be nice to put the version info for Ba
Nick Smith wrote:
>
> in the host summary under that backup client, the "new files" says
> size 4427.8 comp/mb 777.0 comp 82.5%
> thats a heck of a compression ratio. i know that sql dbs can compress
> down nicely, but im comparing to the old
> server and its not the same. the first full backu
I recently changed backup servers, so im starting from scratch on the
pool with a new machine.
Ive configured it just like the old one and i have the old one around
to compare from.
the problem i am having is that the backups on the new machine are
ALOT smaller than on the first.
the client has so
25 matches
Mail list logo
