>> That's good to know, thanks. So the question is (only), how do I tell
>> backuppc to immediately start a new/queue (full or partial) backup, if
>> the prior one was terminated accidentally/abnormally.
>> Backkuppc did not start the full backup here again, yet - although there
>> was no blackout
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Christian G. von Busse wrote:
>> Just go to the home page for that computer and hit "start full
>> backup" and off it should go...
>
> But there is no way to have backuppc do this automatically if the
> backup terminated because the network connection
> Just go to the home page for that computer and hit "start full backup"
> and off it should go...
But there is no way to have backuppc do this automatically if the backup
terminated because the network connection was lost? I had hoped that
backuppc could run unattended.
The log looks like this:
Les Mikesell wrote:
> Andrew Libby wrote:
>>> There are a lot of files on the system, and backups take
>> quite a while so I upped the timeout to 40 hrs, but
>> backups seem to be failing now in under 20 hrs when they
>> were failing at the 20 hr mark.
>>
>> Any hints or suggestions are greatly app
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Christian G. von Busse wrote:
>> BackupPC will automatically use the partial backup as a base during the
>> next full backup, so you'll save a lot of network transfers.
>
> That's good to know, thanks. So the question is (only), how do I tell
> backupp
Just go to the home page for that computer and hit "start full backup"
and off it should go...
Evets
On Tue, Mar 10, 2009 at 1:45 PM, Christian G. von Busse
wrote:
> Hi Tino,
>
>> BackupPC will automatically use the partial backup as a base during the
>> next full backup, so you'll save a lot of
Hi Peter,
On Tue, Mar 10, 2009 at 02:15:56PM -0400, Peter Walter wrote:
> All I have access to is "cloud storage" offsite - running a remote
> backuppc server is not an option. Basically, I have access to rsync /
> sftp / scp as file transfer protocols. What do you think about running a
> dire
Andrew Libby wrote:
>> There are a lot of files on the system, and backups take
> quite a while so I upped the timeout to 40 hrs, but
> backups seem to be failing now in under 20 hrs when they
> were failing at the 20 hr mark.
>
> Any hints or suggestions are greatly apprecaiated. Other
> info th
Peter Walter wrote:
> Les,
>
> All I have access to is "cloud storage" offsite - running a remote
> backuppc server is not an option. Basically, I have access to rsync /
> sftp / scp as file transfer protocols. What do you think about running a
> directory change monitor based upon the Linux ke
mohan infant wrote:
> hello sir i'm final year engineering student now i'm working a project
> BackupPC
> but i have lot of problem in this project
> the backup is normaly done...but the automatic incremental backup is not
> be done..
> i have seen the error "host Backup summary > * this PC
Greetings,
I've got a problem with a backup that seems to have started
with one failed backup back in January. Since then each
attempt at a new backup fails. The log shows
2009-02-24 17:28:55 Saved partial dump 73
2009-02-25 05:02:47 full backup started for directory /;
updating partial #73
20
Les,
All I have access to is "cloud storage" offsite - running a remote
backuppc server is not an option. Basically, I have access to rsync /
sftp / scp as file transfer protocols. What do you think about running a
directory change monitor based upon the Linux kernel inotify() facility,
such
Hi Tino,
> BackupPC will automatically use the partial backup as a base during the
> next full backup, so you'll save a lot of network transfers.
That's good to know, thanks. So the question is (only), how do I tell
backuppc to immediately start a new/queue (full or partial) backup, if the
prior
Hi Marthter
marthter wrote:
> The FAQ still talks about setting FullPeriod to -1 or -2 to disable
> backups instead of the newer method of setting BackupsDisable to 1 or 2:
>
> http://backuppc.sourceforge.net/faq/BackupPC.html#other_installation_topics
You're correct that it needs to be modifie
Peter Walter wrote:
> I checked the cpool directory on my server and it contained 803,023
> files in the directory tree. If rsync is not a scaleable solution for
> backing up a backuppc pool over the internet, does anyone have a
> suggestion for a better solution?
What matters more is how many
Hi folks, long time user here (great tool), first time poster...
The FAQ still talks about setting FullPeriod to -1 or -2 to disable
backups instead of the newer method of setting BackupsDisable to 1 or 2:
http://backuppc.sourceforge.net/faq/BackupPC.html#other_installation_topics
Also th
I checked the cpool directory on my server and it contained 803,023
files in the directory tree. If rsync is not a scaleable solution for
backing up a backuppc pool over the internet, does anyone have a
suggestion for a better solution?
Peter
Les Mikesell wrote:
Carl Wilhelm Soderstrom wrote
Hi Christian,
On Tue, Mar 10, 2009 at 02:20:52PM +0100, Christian G. von Busse wrote:
> Hi - I am rather new with backuppc, but with the help of the docs and the
> web managed to setup a basic, working environment, backing up a Linux
> (ubuntu) machine and windows clients to an ubuntu (8.04.1) se
Hi - I am rather new with backuppc, but with the help of the docs and the
web managed to setup a basic, working environment, backing up a Linux
(ubuntu) machine and windows clients to an ubuntu (8.04.1) server running
backuppc 3.0.0 (from the repository).
Last night, I discovered that the initial,
mohan infant wrote:
> Need help...
>
> Automatic incremental backup is not working..
> BackupPC_dump incremental not working..
> please help.
>
The tar and smb methods base incrementals on the file timestamps, so if
you are testing by creating new files in a way that copies old
timestamps (unp
Carl Wilhelm Soderstrom wrote:
>> Is there a problem with my approach?
>
> The problem with rsync'ing a backuppc data pool is the sheer number of
> files. you'll run your machine out of space with the lists as they get
> loaded into memory.
>
> up to a certain point it will work; and with newer
On 03/09 06:03 , David Lasker wrote:
> Is there a problem with my approach?
The problem with rsync'ing a backuppc data pool is the sheer number of
files. you'll run your machine out of space with the lists as they get
loaded into memory.
up to a certain point it will work; and with newer versions
mohan infant escribió:
> Need help...
>
> Automatic incremental backup is not working..
> BackupPC_dump incremental not working..
> please help.
Hi,
Can you give more information about the problem? any error?
Omar Llorens
JPL TSOLUCIO S.L
www.tsolucio.com
http://bearnas.com
902 886 938
Spain
> -
Need help...
Automatic incremental backup is not working..
BackupPC_dump incremental not working..
please help.
--
___
BackupPC-users mailing list
BackupPC-users@lists.sourceforg
24 matches
Mail list logo
