ckandreou writes:
> Executing: /usr/local/BackupPC/bin/BackupPC_archiveHost
> /usr/local/BackupPC/bin/BackupPC_tarCreate /usr/bin/split ccdev10 348
> /usr/bin/bzip2 .bz2 000 /dev/sa0 *
> Xfer PIDs are now 81631
> Writing tar archive for host ccdev10, backup #348 to /dev/sa0
> Got unknown t
Le 05/06/2009 01:49, Claude Gélinas a écrit :
> I need to migrate my backupPC server from FC7 to FC10 but I can't just
> upgrade my server. I've installed a new HD with FC10 on the same server
> so now I need to know how to transfer my setting form the old HD to the
> new one without losing my setu
I need to migrate my backupPC server from FC7 to FC10 but I can't just
upgrade my server. I've installed a new HD with FC10 on the same server
so now I need to know how to transfer my setting form the old HD to the
new one without losing my setup. All my backuped file are on a partition
mounted on
Les Mikesell wrote at about 15:23:57 -0500 on Thursday, June 4, 2009:
> Jeffrey J. Kosowsky wrote:
> >
> > >
> > > He doesn't have to 'hope' you need a restore - he can just wipe all the
> > > live copies. Now it's time for you to put back the old working copies.
> > > With the curre
Jeffrey J. Kosowsky wrote:
>
> >
> > He doesn't have to 'hope' you need a restore - he can just wipe all the
> > live copies. Now it's time for you to put back the old working copies.
> > With the current backuppc scheme of collision detection you could - if
> > you relied on md5's blind
Jeffrey J. Kosowsky wrote:
> Adam Goryachev wrote at about 13:42:41 +1000 on Wednesday, June 3, 2009:
>
> > clint woodrow wrote:
> >
> > >
> > > Matthias Meyer wrote:
> > >
> > > > rsync(d) transmit only changed parts of a file
> > > > (http://www.samba.org/rsync). e.g. a 2.6 GB mailbox.pst a
Les Mikesell wrote at about 11:08:53 -0500 on Thursday, June 4, 2009:
> Jeffrey J. Kosowsky wrote:
> >
> > > However, it would still be disturbing to realize that your backup
> > > integrity could be compromised by anyone with access to the files.
> > > Consider a scenario where a disgru
Bharat Mistry wrote:
> I'm trying to understand the various seeetings I need to make to achieve
> this and a bit confused.
>
> I'm backing up 9 PC's with BackupPC
>
> I have been asked to make sure ALL hosts keep at least 3 months of Full
> backups and assocaited incremental
Do you need all da
ckandreou wrote:
> Dear all,
>
> I am using 36/72 Backup tapes. I am getting the following error message when
> I am trying to backup/transfer from the BackupPC server to tape drive. I
> would appreciated if someone can provide me with direction on how should I
> proceed in handling the error.
I'm trying to understand the various seeetings I need to make to achieve
this and a bit confused.
I'm backing up 9 PC's with BackupPC
I have been asked to make sure ALL hosts keep at least 3 months of Full
backups and assocaited incremental
We are taking about around 5-20Gb in most cases - I don'
Adam Goryachev wrote:
>
>> However, it would still be disturbing to realize that your backup
>> integrity could be compromised by anyone with access to the files.
>> Consider a scenario where a disgruntled employee who still has access to
>> files first prepares the 'evil twin' file with the hac
Dear all,
I am using 36/72 Backup tapes. I am getting the following error message when I
am trying to backup/transfer from the BackupPC server to tape drive. I would
appreciated if someone can provide me with direction on how should I proceed in
handling the error. the error message is as fol
Jeffrey J. Kosowsky wrote:
>
> > However, it would still be disturbing to realize that your backup
> > integrity could be compromised by anyone with access to the files.
> > Consider a scenario where a disgruntled employee who still has access to
> > files first prepares the 'evil twin' fil
Tino Schwarze wrote at about 11:44:29 +0200 on Thursday, June 4, 2009:
> Hi Flavio,
>
> On Thu, Jun 04, 2009 at 08:23:36AM +0200, Boniforti Flavio wrote:
>
> > > Q: Does anyone know?
> > > A: Yes
> >
> > Maybe I'm the only human which thinks a bit more "elastically", but if
> > anybody
Les Mikesell wrote at about 10:02:34 -0500 on Thursday, June 4, 2009:
> Jeffrey J. Kosowsky wrote:
> >
> > As I proved in my earlier post, the chance of a collision on even a
> > Petabyte sized pool is about 1 in 10^38.
>
> Note that we've all gotten used to trusting tcp crcs for error det
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Les Mikesell wrote:
> Jeffrey J. Kosowsky wrote:
>> As I proved in my earlier post, the chance of a collision on even a
>> Petabyte sized pool is about 1 in 10^38.
>
> Note that we've all gotten used to trusting tcp crcs for error detection
> and it
Jeffrey J. Kosowsky wrote:
>
> > And for extra points, figure out which variations could be adapted to
> > incremental updates as you might want to do to keep an offsite copy in
> > sync. The blockdevice approach would probably require ZFS with its
> > snapshot send/receive functions. The
Hi Everyone,
Thanks for your answears. It allowed us to find and solve the problem.
On our BackupPc server, a munin plugin was executing a BackupPC_serverMesg
status command.
Because the PC is abit old and overloaded, the answear of the command often
arrived after the 5sec timeout. Without th
Jeffrey J. Kosowsky wrote:
>
> As I proved in my earlier post, the chance of a collision on even a
> Petabyte sized pool is about 1 in 10^38.
Note that we've all gotten used to trusting tcp crcs for error detection
and it's probably much weaker.
However, it would still be disturbing to realize
Hello list,
I'd like to forget about the archiving host and its function now that
I've set it up. Is there any way to schedule it to run at a given time
from the BackupPC interface? The only alternative solution I can think
of is using a cron job... What are your suggestions?
I'd like to have the
Boniforti Flavio wrote:
> Hallo Tino,
>
>>> But that may be a weird and complex way-of-thinking that is
>> affecting
>>> only me :-/
>> Nope, I tend to think like that as well. :-|
>
> OK, let's not waste anoybody's time with above "phylosophycal"
> matters... ;-)
On the contrary, Pythagoras'
Tino Schwarze wrote at about 11:35:46 +0200 on Thursday, June 4, 2009:
> Hi there,
>
> (I already felt like I was going to look dumb or anxious by writing what
> I wrote...)
>
> On Wed, Jun 03, 2009 at 01:09:38PM -0400, Jeffrey J. Kosowsky wrote:
> > Tino Schwarze wrote at about 18:39:26 +
+1
I'd be interested to take a look as well...
Stephane
royden yates wrote:
> On Tue, 2009-06-02 at 15:10 -0500, Robert J. Phillips wrote:
>
>> I have generated a deb file and upgraded my BackupPC 3.1.0 to 3.2.0
>> beta. Everything seems to be working fine.
>>
>>
>>
>> Can I submit the d
Recently our BackupPC server reached the max limit on the pool
filesystem for performing backups. The BackupPC stopped performing
automatic backups of hosts (as it is supposed to). So we deleted some
data that was on the same partition as the the pool filesystem but the
BackupPC has never cha
Hi Flavio,
On Thu, Jun 04, 2009 at 12:03:07PM +0200, Boniforti Flavio wrote:
> > My advice: Just account on total amount of data backed up.
> > And this is the number you get in the host summary page as
> > "Full Size(GB)" and in host status page in the "File
> > Size/Count Reuse Summary" tabl
Hallo Tino,
> > But that may be a weird and complex way-of-thinking that is
> affecting
> > only me :-/
>
> Nope, I tend to think like that as well. :-|
OK, let's not waste anoybody's time with above "phylosophycal"
matters... ;-)
> The short answer is: You cannot account for single host disk
On Wed, Jun 03, 2009 at 10:25:01PM -0400, jbk wrote:
> I am trying to understand this subject heading so that I can
> correct my backup archive. I have been running backuppc for
> over a year now and the backed up data appears to be good. I
> have done individual file restores without issues. W
Hi Flavio,
On Thu, Jun 04, 2009 at 08:23:36AM +0200, Boniforti Flavio wrote:
> > Q: Does anyone know?
> > A: Yes
>
> Maybe I'm the only human which thinks a bit more "elastically", but if
> anybody asks:
>
> "Anybody knows why there's difference between the above 2 values?"
>
> I'm prone to ex
Hi there,
(I already felt like I was going to look dumb or anxious by writing what
I wrote...)
On Wed, Jun 03, 2009 at 01:09:38PM -0400, Jeffrey J. Kosowsky wrote:
> Tino Schwarze wrote at about 18:39:26 +0200 on Wednesday, June 3, 2009:
> > > > I recently heard about lessfs, which runs on top o
Ralf Gross schrieb:
> there is a regular discussion on how to backup/move/copy the backuppc
> pool. Did anyone try to backup the pool with bacula?
>
> I need to expand the raid volume where the pool is stored (Arecac RAID
> controller). Doing this without backup is a bit frightening (I didn't
> us
30 matches
Mail list logo
