Bowie Bailey wrote:
> Alexander Fortin wrote:
>> What do you suggest as a physical storage architecture with an off-site
>> weekly clone? Maybe RAID1 with 2 disks as master and a spare one, to
>> synchronize now and then? Or maybe is better something like a RAID1 with
>> 2 disks and then some (r
Alexander Fortin wrote:
> What do you suggest as a physical storage architecture with an off-site
> weekly clone? Maybe RAID1 with 2 disks as master and a spare one, to
> synchronize now and then? Or maybe is better something like a RAID1 with
> 2 disks and then some (r)sync tool to get the clon
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/DRBD
Oh yes, I tried this as well. Works only if your connection to the
remote site is fast enough. Otherwise you'd need to purchase the drdb
proxy for some hundred bucks.
And additionally: drdb is not a backup, it'
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/DRBD
2009/11/20 Christian Völker :
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Hi,
>
>> I've been actually wondering what's the best way to keep a clone of the
>> pool directory, because I want to do an off-site copy now and then.
> Welcome. This is one of th
Hi Richard,
Richard Hansen wrote:
> Les Mikesell wrote:
>> Richard Hansen wrote:
>>> Apparently not -- both of my clients already have rsync 3.0.5 installed,
>>> yet rsync is causing them to run out of memory. The clients have 4 to 6
>>> million (largely redundant) files each. It appears tha
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
> I've been actually wondering what's the best way to keep a clone of the
> pool directory, because I want to do an off-site copy now and then.
Welcome. This is one of the most discussed topics in this list...
> What do you suggest as a physical
Hi everybody. I've been using BackupPC for more then 1 year here in
office for my small business and this is the very first post on this ML,
and that because I'm very happy with the product: so far I had no
problem at all, nor today.
I've been actually wondering what's the best way to keep a cl
On Friday 20 Nov 2009 15:24:04 ludovic cavalier wrote:
> I did not find any idea to deal with this.
> apache mod_ldap can not bind to ldap directory using email adress.
>
> Is there any way to solve this problem ? Something like "if uid bind is
> ok, get email user adress to match his machine" ?
hi,
Can you help me with ldap authentification and the way packuppc deals
with it.
Ldap auth with ldap uid works fine.
Exp :
user djoe can bind to ldap using its uid(djoe)/password and then get
information about his machine, associated with djoe user.
My problem is about email reminders. Back
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello Les,
sorry for waiting so long with my answer, but work did slow me down a
little bit.
Les Mikesell schrieb:
> It is actually a bit hard to duplicate the command exactly since backuppc
> passes
> the credentials in the environment so you don'
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello Michael,
sorry for waiting so long with my answer, but work did slow me down a
little bit.
Michael Stowe schrieb:
> Bizarre! You're saying that the command line works when you run it, but
> the exact same command line fails when run by backupp
11 matches
Mail list logo
