Am Mittwoch, den 16.12.2009, 11:27 -0900 schrieb Chris Robertson:
> M. Sabath wrote:
> > Hello all,
> >
> > I use backuppc on Debian 5.
> > Since I upgraded from Debian 4 to Debian 5 backuppc doesn't run
> > automatically.
> >
> > Our server runs only during daytime between 7am and 19 pm
> >
>
(unfortunately i don't receive copies of my own emails, but...)
i figured out what was going on. (or google did... of course...)
from the page:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/backuppc/+bug/283652
"I believe that the fix you need is to edit /etc/backuppc/config.pl. There
are three st
so i've set up my backuppc server again (we got a bunch of new drives and
new server) and rather than upgrade, i just did a fresh installation. so
i've migrated my settings from v2.1 to v3.2.0beta0, and i'm having a problem
with smb transfers.
they seem to fail. here's a sample xfer error log fi
On Wed, Dec 16, 2009 at 03:13:23PM -0600, Les Mikesell wrote:
> Robin Lee Powell wrote:
> >
> > They're just not *doing* anything. Nothing has errored out; BackupPC
> > thinks everything is fine.
> >
> > Some of the places this is happening are very small backups that
> > usually take a matter o
Kameleon wrote:
> I have a few remote sites I am wanting to backup using backuppc.
> However, two are on slow DSL connections and the other 2 are on T1's.
> I did some math and roughly figured that the DSL connections, having a
> 256k upload, could do approximately 108MB/hour of transfer. With t
Robin Lee Powell wrote:
>
> They're just not *doing* anything. Nothing has errored out; BackupPC
> thinks everything is fine.
>
> Some of the places this is happening are very small backups that
> usually take a matter of minutes.
>
> Suddenly this isn't looking like a networking problem anymor
I have a few remote sites I am wanting to backup using backuppc. However,
two are on slow DSL connections and the other 2 are on T1's. I did some math
and roughly figured that the DSL connections, having a 256k upload, could do
approximately 108MB/hour of transfer. With these clients having around
M. Sabath wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> I use backuppc on Debian 5.
> Since I upgraded from Debian 4 to Debian 5 backuppc doesn't run
> automatically.
>
> Our server runs only during daytime between 7am and 19 pm
>
Let me see if I have this right... Your server is only powered on from
7 am to 7 pm.
Hi,
Added some debugging code to Storage/Text.pm sub TextFileWrite, it
used to look like this :
rename("$file.new", "$file") if ( -f "$file.new" );
I changed it to :
if ( -f "$file.new" ) {
my $renRet = rename("$file.new", "$file");
if ($renRet) {
On last thing: Stop/Dequeue Backup did the right thing: all parts of
the backup, on both server and client, were torn down correctly.
So, clearly, there was nothing wrong with the communication between
parts as such.
-Robin
--
They say: "The first AIs will be built by the military as weapons.
Sorry, a couple of things I forgot.
On Wed, Dec 16, 2009 at 11:15:37AM -0800, Robin Lee Powell wrote:
> Anyways, the one that has the problem consistently *also* always has
> it in exactly the same place; I was watching it in basically every
> way possible, so here comes the debugging stuff. As w
I want to start by saying that I appreciate all the help and
suggestions y'all have given on something that's obviously not your
problem. :) Unfortunately, it looks like this problem is (1) far
more interesting than I thought and (2) might be in BackupPC itself.
On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 11:29:46A
Robin Lee Powell schrieb:
> RedHat GFS *really* doesn't like directories with large numbers of
> files. It's not a big fan of stat() calls, either.
Well, a network Cluster Filesystem is no fun to backup and might very
well be the bottleneck.
Ralf
---
Robin Lee Powell wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 05:42:55PM -0800, Robin Lee Powell wrote:
>> Just to give a sense of scale here:
>>
>> # date ; find /pictures -xdev -type f -printf "%h\n" >/tmp/dirs ; date
>> Tue Dec 15 12:50:57 PST 2009
>> Tue Dec 15 17:26:44 PST 2009
>>
>> (something I ran to t
On 12/16 06:38 , Carl Wilhelm Soderstrom wrote:
> On 12/15 05:42 , Robin Lee Powell wrote:
> > The other one isn't even close to finishing, as far as I can tell.
> > In the face of it taking nigh-on 5 hours just to *walk the tree*,
> > from the local host, I haven't been focusing on little things l
On 12/15 05:42 , Robin Lee Powell wrote:
> The other one isn't even close to finishing, as far as I can tell.
> In the face of it taking nigh-on 5 hours just to *walk the tree*,
> from the local host, I haven't been focusing on little things like
> ssh encryption choices too much. :)
So you're co
On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 05:42:55PM -0800, Robin Lee Powell wrote:
> Just to give a sense of scale here:
>
> # date ; find /pictures -xdev -type f -printf "%h\n" >/tmp/dirs ; date
> Tue Dec 15 12:50:57 PST 2009
> Tue Dec 15 17:26:44 PST 2009
>
> (something I ran to try to figure out how to partiti
17 matches
Mail list logo
