Marcelino writes:
> Backupps file says this:
>
> 0 partial 1275390002 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 1 smb 0 3.1.0
Somehow an incomplete backups file got written. The 4th field is the
end time, which is 0 in this case.
Since no files we backed up I'd recommend removing the "0" directory
and
Excellent, thank-you.
I'll try this with Server 2003 this week.
Gerald
- "Michael Stowe" wrote:
> I actually did this recently, and it's documented here:
> http://www.goodjobsucking.com/?p=219
>
> If you just want to restore a few registry keys, the procedure is
> here:
> http://www.goodj
For anyone else having this problem, this is exactly what I did. The NAS
recently mounted was always mounted as /tbms, so:
r...@kw157:/var/lib/backuppc/pc$ /etc/init.d/backuppc stop
r...@kw157:/var/lib/backuppc/pc$ ls -d */*/f???/ftbms | xargs rm -rf
/usr/share/backuppc/bin/BackupPC_nightly 0 25
Thanks, this looks perfect!
On Jun 1, 2010, at 1:30 PM, Carl Wilhelm Soderstrom wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 1, 2010 at 1:46 PM, James Ward wrote:
>> Recently, a new NAS was mounted on several servers and the BackupPC
>> filesystem filled before I got the new NAS excluded. What's the best way to
>> g
On Tue, Jun 1, 2010 at 1:46 PM, James Ward wrote:
> Recently, a new NAS was mounted on several servers and the BackupPC
> filesystem filled before I got the new NAS excluded. What's the best way to
> get BackupPC moving again. It's 100% full.
I know there are more elaborate ways to do this, b
On Tue, Jun 1, 2010 at 1:46 PM, James Ward wrote:
> Recently, a new NAS was mounted on several servers and the BackupPC
> filesystem filled before I got the new NAS excluded. What's the best way to
> get BackupPC moving again. It's 100% full.
I'm not an experienced BackupPC user or manager of
I actually did this recently, and it's documented here:
http://www.goodjobsucking.com/?p=219
If you just want to restore a few registry keys, the procedure is here:
http://www.goodjobsucking.com/?p=172
> Hi,
>
> I have BackupPC backing up Windows C: drive using cygwin 1.7/ssh/rsync and
> vss. It
Hi,
I have BackupPC backing up Windows C: drive using cygwin 1.7/ssh/rsync and vss.
It works like a charm.
My question is, now that I have a clean backup of drive C:, how can I restore
the registry if I need to?
My thoughts are for disaster recovery. I can re-install the OS, and do a full
Recently, a new NAS was mounted on several servers and the BackupPC filesystem
filled before I got the new NAS excluded. What's the best way to get BackupPC
moving again. It's 100% full.
Thanks in advance,
James
--
_
On Fri, May 28, 2010 at 03:56:00PM +0200, Matteo Sgalaberni wrote:
> Hi,
>
> do you know if there are ways to restore file attributes (uid/gid,
> permissions) fetching file attributes from BackupPC?
I will reply to myself...I hope that this will be useful for someone
else ...
First export a list
On Tue, Jun 1, 2010 at 6:40 AM, Paso wrote:
>
> Hi there,
>
> actually I use Backuppc to backup several Windows- and Linux-Hosts on my
> local network which works quite well. Now I'm planning to store snapshots of
> several hosts data outside my house for security reasons.
> That means: I'd like
On 6/1/2010 10:32 AM, plight wrote:
>
> I have 5 test hosts configured and my post dump scripts run perfectly. So it
> is in fact backing up the data.
>
> My problem is it runs twice. It will run once at 1am and then again at 2am.
> I cant for the life of me figure out why it is doing this. A
On 01/06/10 14:41, Les Mikesell wrote:
> Carl Wilhelm Soderstrom wrote:
>> On 05/30 04:12 , Michael Stowe wrote:
>>> It's generally slower, so I'm going to go with "no" on this one.
>>
>> > From the tests I've seen, ext2 is notably faster than ext3. Not doing
>> journaling does make a difference.
>
I have 5 test hosts configured and my post dump scripts run perfectly. So it
is in fact backing up the data.
My problem is it runs twice. It will run once at 1am and then again at 2am. I
cant for the life of me figure out why it is doing this. Am I missing a
setting?
The did reroute ping
Hi there,
actually I use Backuppc to backup several Windows- and Linux-Hosts on my local
network which works quite well. Now I'm planning to store snapshots of several
hosts data outside my house for security reasons.
That means: I'd like to copy the recent data-snapshot of a backuppc-host to
>
> 14760 days ago is approximately 1970, which is 0 in unix time.
> So perhaps a 0 ended up in the backups file for that host.
>
> Was it ever hand edited?
I did do upgrade of O/S after image creation so my original backuppc
computer is running Backuppc 3.1.0-6ubuntu4 and new one is running
Marcelino writes:
> The message is from "/usr/share/backuppc/lib/BackupPC/Lang/en.pm." and
> says something like this:
> "Your PC (user) has not been successfully backed up for 14760.2 days."
>
> I noticed the message comes from $days but I can't figure out how it's
> calculating it wrong...
147
Hi @,
what is the interpretation of the Error:
"Could not connect to database"
in the server log file ( /var/lib/backuppc/log/LOG )?
The backups seem o.k., however this error is listed 5 times per hour in
the server log.
(I'm backing up 3 Linux machines with rsync and 1 Windows client (with
cy
Carl Wilhelm Soderstrom wrote:
> On 05/30 04:12 , Michael Stowe wrote:
>> It's generally slower, so I'm going to go with "no" on this one.
>
>>From the tests I've seen, ext2 is notably faster than ext3. Not doing
> journaling does make a difference.
>
> If you wanted to speed up ext3; you can put
On 05/30 04:12 , Michael Stowe wrote:
> It's generally slower, so I'm going to go with "no" on this one.
>From the tests I've seen, ext2 is notably faster than ext3. Not doing
journaling does make a difference.
If you wanted to speed up ext3; you can put the journal on a separate device
(even an
20 matches
Mail list logo
