I'm also assuming this means it'll be harder to access the data outside of
BackupPC itself as well.
Craig Barratt wrote:
> Trey writes:
>
>
> > I should probably look back at the archives for this, but "no
> > hardlinks"? I thought that was the way the pool was able to save disk
> > space
On Thu, Aug 05, 2010 at 12:29:50PM +0200, Clemens Kalb wrote:
> Is this a good idea, or will it break BackupPC at some point?
one issue - if you use the checksum-seed option to rsync, files
that already exist in the pool are not transferred, even when you
do a full backup. If that's OK with you i
... I know, that this was discussed some time ago (12.10.2009).
I use rsync with incremental backups.
My configuration:
$Conf{RsyncArgs} = [
'--numeric-ids',
'--perms',
'--owner',
'--group',
'-D',
'--links',
'--hard-links',
'--times',
'--block-size=2048',
'--recursive',
'--e
I will be out of the office until Monday August 9th. If this is an urgent
request please email soluti...@artistechnewmedia.com
Thank-you
Danielle Tilley
--
This SF.net email is sponsored by
Make an app they can't l
I will be out of the office until Monday August 9th. If this is an urgent
request please email soluti...@artistechnewmedia.com
Thank-you
Danielle Tilley
--
This SF.net email is sponsored by
Make an app they can't l
I am having trouble getting SMB backups to complete.
Sometimes it will backup a few gb, and then fail (with alarm) and sometimes it
will not backup any files at all.
SMB is the only method I am using to backup as I'm on a windows network :(.
Installing rsync or ssh on each machine is an option
Trey writes:
> I should probably look back at the archives for this, but "no
> hardlinks"? I thought that was the way the pool was able to save disk
> space -- an essential feature (at least for us). Is this going to be
> implemented in some other way?
Yes, pooling continues to work. Refer
