Hello Less Micksell,
Thank you for your reply.
I use the daemon rsyncd cause the security guy told me that this solution is
more secure than using rsync/ssh without password between the machines
(backuppc is installed on a real server used for other things, too)
When I launch the command fro
On 9/23/10 1:49 AM, Sorin Srbu wrote:
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Les Mikesell [mailto:lesmikes...@gmail.com]
>> Sent: Wednesday, September 22, 2010 4:33 PM
>> To: backuppc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
>> Subject: Re: [BackupPC-users] Mail problem with BPC
>>
>>> Getting the below error i
On 9/23/10 3:21 AM, IvyAlice wrote:
> Hello Less Micksell,
>
>
>
> Thank you for your reply.
>
> I use the daemon rsyncd cause the security guy told me that this solution is
> more secure than using rsync/ssh without password between the machines
> (backuppc is installed on a real server used for
>-Original Message-
>From: Les Mikesell [mailto:lesmikes...@gmail.com]
>Sent: Thursday, September 23, 2010 2:38 PM
>To: backuppc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
>Subject: Re: [BackupPC-users] Mail problem with BPC
>>>
>>> The -t option is for sendmail to tell it the To: address is already in
>>
Hi,
I unpacked the tar on the backup server itself, which is also the host on
which I used firefox to download the tarfile.
The only tar I found is version 1.23 (corresponding to the debian/testing tar
package 1.23-2.1)
However, my primary problem is not tar. The primary problem is that I hav
[..]
> Have you tried getting a zip archive from the GUI instead? Or using
> BackupPC_zipCreate on the CLI?
No, sorry, I've not tried zip yet.
I'll first try to understand why things work on one but not the other system.
I've by found a windows XP host who friendly accepts the restores sent t
On 9/23/2010 10:05 AM, Marcus Hardt wrote:
> [..]
>
>> Have you tried getting a zip archive from the GUI instead? Or using
>> BackupPC_zipCreate on the CLI?
>
> No, sorry, I've not tried zip yet.
>
> I'll first try to understand why things work on one but not the other system.
>
>
> I've by found
[..]
> I think it does the basic permissions that map to unix equivalents. It
> doesn't preserve acls, nor does it have any way to work around the
> existing ones - so you may have files that you can read in the backups
> but can't write back over the existing copy
Right. There might be files al
On Thu, Sep 23, 2010 at 05:52:26PM +0200, Marcus Hardt wrote:
> [..]
>
> > I think it does the basic permissions that map to unix
> > equivalents. It doesn't preserve acls, nor does it have any way
> > to work around the existing ones - so you may have files that
> > you can read in the backups b
> On Thu, Sep 23, 2010 at 05:52:26PM +0200, Marcus Hardt wrote:
>> [..]
>>
>> > I think it does the basic permissions that map to unix
>> > equivalents. It doesn't preserve acls, nor does it have any way
>> > to work around the existing ones - so you may have files that
>> > you can read in the ba
Another question: The script, running with "-c", failed eventually
at this line:
my $err = $bpc->ServerConnect($Conf{ServerHost}, $Conf{ServerPort});
My serverport is set to -1; does it need to be set for this to work?
Could you not just call BackupPC_ServerMesg instead? Perhaps I
should h
On 9/23/2010 12:47 PM, Michael Stowe wrote:
>
>> I really don't think that would work.
>
> It would not work, nor is it possible, since Windows can't delete files
> that are in use.
Rsync normally creates a tmp file with a different name which is renamed
when complete. Tar would just truncate an
12 matches
Mail list logo
