Re: [BackupPC-users] Could Digest::MD5 be broken on ARM-based - SOLUTION TO FIX broken pools computers?

2011-01-25 Thread Jeffrey J. Kosowsky
Jeffrey J. Kosowsky wrote at about 20:07:37 -0500 on Sunday, January 23, 2011: > Jeffrey J. Kosowsky wrote at about 19:19:54 -0500 on Sunday, January 23, > 2011: > > I was testing some of my md5sum routines and I kept getting weird > > results on ARM-based computers. > > > > Specificall

Re: [BackupPC-users] Filesystem separation

2011-01-25 Thread John Goerzen
Rob Owens ptd.net> writes: > One reason I always specify the --one-file-system argument for rsync is > that prevents me from accidentally backing up an NFS share. Since I use > BackupPC for all the computers on my LAN, the data in the NFS share gets > backed up when I back up the server that is

[BackupPC-users] rsync with --no-inc-recursive

2011-01-25 Thread John Goerzen
Hi, I notice that the default BackupPC config uses --recursive with rsync. According to rsync's manpage, this may cause it to miss hardlinks: "If incremental recursion is active (see --recursive), rsync may transfer a missing hard-linked file before it finds that another link for that content

Re: [BackupPC-users] Filesystem separation

2011-01-25 Thread Rob Owens
On Tue, Jan 25, 2011 at 06:17:12PM -0600, John Goerzen wrote: > Hi, > > In reading the manual for parameters such as the tar, rsync, etc. share, > I see: > > "Alternatively, rather than backup all the file systems as a single > share ("/"), it is easier to restore a single file system if you ba

[BackupPC-users] Filesystem separation

2011-01-25 Thread John Goerzen
Hi, In reading the manual for parameters such as the tar, rsync, etc. share, I see: "Alternatively, rather than backup all the file systems as a single share ("/"), it is easier to restore a single file system if you backup each file system separately." Can anyone tell me why this is easier?