Dear list,
since I cannot edit the wiki, I wanted to make sure to share this
supplemental method of
https://sourceforge.net/apps/mediawiki/backuppc/index.php?title=How_to_import_data_for_a_backup
with you.
We were tasked with importing a host with several hundreds of
gigabytes behind a relat
Is there some secret sauce for editing the wiki? I am logged in but
there are no edit buttons.
Cheers,
--
martin | http://madduck.net/ | http://two.sentenc.es/
"there are more things in heaven and earth, horatio,
than are dreamt of in your philosophy."
Hi,
Scott wrote on 2011-05-31 19:57:11 -0400 [Re: [BackupPC-users] hard links
again]:
> I noticed the backup data appears to be stored in the pc directory. Does
> that mean the hardlinks are in the pool directory and not in the pc
> directory?
ah, you don't understand what hardlinks are. Hardl
I noticed the backup data appears to be stored in the pc directory. Does
that mean the hardlinks are in the pool directory and not in the pc
directory?
So would it be possible to store the pc directory in a different directory
(in my flexraid pool) but store the pool directory in a normal ext fi
On 5/31/2011 3:20 PM, Scott wrote:
> Is it possible for backuppc to use symbolic or soft links instead of
> hard links?
No, it is the atomic nature of kernel hardlink handling that makes what
backuppc does possible.
> I found a seemingly great software "FlexRaid" which allows me to create
> a so
Nope - hard links are the essence of BackupPC
Scott wrote at about 16:20:37 -0400 on Tuesday, May 31, 2011:
> Is it possible for backuppc to use symbolic or soft links instead of hard
> links?
>
> I found a seemingly great software "FlexRaid" which allows me to create a
> software parity raid
Is it possible for backuppc to use symbolic or soft links instead of hard
links?
I found a seemingly great software "FlexRaid" which allows me to create a
software parity raid using various drives.However, it does not support
hard links, only soft!
-
Hi,
Pavel Hofman wrote on 2011-05-31 15:24:56 +0200 [[BackupPC-users] Rsynv vs.
tar, full vs. incremental]:
> Incremental backup of a linux machine using tar (i.e. only files newer
> than...) is several times faster than using rsync.
that could be because it is missing files that rsync catches.
Hi,
Incremental backup of a linux machine using tar (i.e. only files newer
than...) is several times faster than using rsync. On the other hand,
full backup using tar transfers huge amount of data over network, way
more than the efficient rsync.
Is there a way to use rsync for full backup and tar
