On 1/20/2012 4:49 PM, Tim Fletcher wrote:
> On Fri, 2012-01-20 at 16:11 -0800, smallpox wrote:
>> On 1/20/2012 11:49 AM, Jeffrey J. Kosowsky wrote:
>>> Second, what makes you think the issue is a bandwidth issue? You just
>>> said that it takes 10 minutes. Have you determined that the time is
>>>
On 1/20/2012 4:49 PM, Tim Fletcher wrote:
> On Fri, 2012-01-20 at 16:11 -0800, smallpox wrote:
>> On 1/20/2012 11:49 AM, Jeffrey J. Kosowsky wrote:
>>> Second, what makes you think the issue is a bandwidth issue? You just
>>> said that it takes 10 minutes. Have you determined that the time is
>>>
On Fri, 2012-01-20 at 16:11 -0800, smallpox wrote:
>
> On 1/20/2012 11:49 AM, Jeffrey J. Kosowsky wrote:
> > Second, what makes you think the issue is a bandwidth issue? You just
> > said that it takes 10 minutes. Have you determined that the time is
> > due to bandwidth bottlenecks and not just
51 incr no 1 1/20 06:45 10.4 0.4
/home/backuppc/BackupPC-3.2.1/pc/danger/51
52 incr no 2 1/20 07:00 0.2 0.4
/home/backuppc/BackupPC-3.2.1/pc/danger/52
53 incr no 2 1/20 07:15 0.2 0.4
/home/backuppc/BackupPC-3.2.1
On 1/20/2012 11:49 AM, Jeffrey J. Kosowsky wrote:
> smallpox wrote at about 07:15:07 -0800 on Friday, January 20, 2012:
> > i was under the impression that rsync does the comparison with little or
> > no bandwidth.
>
> First, PLEASE DON'T TOP-POST - it makes following and responding
> to a
> i was under the impression that rsync does the comparison with little or
> no bandwidth.
Little bandwidth, yes (although this is relative, naturally) but taking
little bandwidth and taking little *time* are two entirely different
things.
Rsync on each end is calculating and exchanging hashes.
On 01/20/2012 09:07 PM, Jeffrey J. Kosowsky wrote:
> Stefan Peter wrote at about 21:00:22 +0100 on Friday, January 20, 2012:
> > On 01/20/2012 08:49 PM, Jeffrey J. Kosowsky wrote:
> > > In summary, I think you are trying to solve a problem that may not
> > > need to be solved, using a to
On Fri, Jan 20, 2012 at 2:07 PM, Jeffrey J. Kosowsky
wrote:
> Stefan Peter wrote at about 21:00:22 +0100 on Friday, January 20, 2012:
> > On 01/20/2012 08:49 PM, Jeffrey J. Kosowsky wrote:
> > > In summary, I think you are trying to solve a problem that may not
> > > need to be solved, using a
On 20-Jan-12 12:07, Jeffrey J. Kosowsky wrote:
> Stefan Peter wrote at about 21:00:22 +0100 on Friday, January 20, 2012:
> > On 01/20/2012 08:49 PM, Jeffrey J. Kosowsky wrote:
> > > In summary, I think you are trying to solve a problem that may not
> > > need to be solved, using a tool t
Stefan Peter wrote at about 21:00:22 +0100 on Friday, January 20, 2012:
> On 01/20/2012 08:49 PM, Jeffrey J. Kosowsky wrote:
> > In summary, I think you are trying to solve a problem that may not
> > need to be solved, using a tool that is not meant to solve it, without
> > understanding what i
On 01/20/2012 08:49 PM, Jeffrey J. Kosowsky wrote:
> In summary, I think you are trying to solve a problem that may not
> need to be solved, using a tool that is not meant to solve it, without
> understanding what is causing your problems and without knowing how
> the tool actually works in the fir
Till Hofmann wrote at about 16:23:56 +0100 on Friday, January 20, 2012:
> Hello everybody,
>
> since my backup partition is on a RAID5 which doesn't do anything but
> keeping my backups, I want the hard drives to automatically spin down
> (standby) when there is nothing to do.
> It's working
smallpox wrote at about 07:15:07 -0800 on Friday, January 20, 2012:
> i was under the impression that rsync does the comparison with little or
> no bandwidth.
First, PLEASE DON'T TOP-POST - it makes following and responding
to a thread near impossible.
Second, what makes you think the issue is
On Fri, Jan 20, 2012 at 11:16 AM, smallpox wrote:
> understood, there arent a lot of files currently, nothing has changed
> since day 1.
>
> its only 400 mb.
>
> if i have level 2, it does incremental in 10 seconds, why does that
> happen? level 1 takes 10 min
That doesn't make much sense to me f
understood, there arent a lot of files currently, nothing has changed
since day 1.
its only 400 mb.
if i have level 2, it does incremental in 10 seconds, why does that
happen? level 1 takes 10 min
On 1/20/2012 8:19 AM, Les Mikesell wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 20, 2012 at 9:15 AM, smallpox wrote:
>>
On Fri, Jan 20, 2012 at 9:15 AM, smallpox wrote:
> i was under the impression that rsync does the comparison with little or
> no bandwidth.
It generally does not use a big percentage of the data, but the client
sends the full directory tree data to the server where the comparison
happens. If yo
Hello everybody,
since my backup partition is on a RAID5 which doesn't do anything but
keeping my backups, I want the hard drives to automatically spin down
(standby) when there is nothing to do.
It's working properly, I only have one problem: backuppc writes to the
per-pc log file in $topdir/pc/$
i was under the impression that rsync does the comparison with little or
no bandwidth.
On 1/20/2012 5:50 AM, Michael Stowe wrote:
>> BackupPC 3.2.1
>> Windows 7 rsyncd over ssh, west coast
>> the server is in the east.
>>
>> my goal is to have it updated every 15 minutes, i've gotten that to work
> BackupPC 3.2.1
> Windows 7 rsyncd over ssh, west coast
> the server is in the east.
>
> my goal is to have it updated every 15 minutes, i've gotten that to work
> but for incremental, with no changes, it's still taking about 10 minutes
> most of the time and it is doing traffic.
I would expect m
19 matches
Mail list logo
