Hi Cassiano
On Tue, 6 Nov 2012 10:03:44 +
Cassiano Surek wrote:
> Of course, how could I have missed that! I did find it now, thanks
> Michał.
>
> Last full backup (of 100 odd Gb) took slightly north of 10 days to
> complete. Incremental, just over 5 days.
That seems rather slow. I have Ba
Of course, how could I have missed that! I did find it now, thanks Michał.
Last full backup (of 100 odd Gb) took slightly north of 10 days to complete.
Incremental, just over 5 days.
On 6 Nov 2012, at 09:58, Michał Sawicz wrote:
> W dniu 06.11.2012 10:43, Cassiano Surek pisze:
>> That indeed ma
Hi Michael, thanks for answering.
>
> On a full, it looks like my systems generally get around 6Mb/s, and closer
> to 1Mb/s on an incremental -- comparing the files may not take a lot of
> bandwidth, but it does take resources on both sides, so what you're seeing
> may be normal for an incrementa
You make a valid point. I will add more to it, likely raising things to 8Gb.
Many thanks for your attention.
On 5 Nov 2012, at 21:30, Jeff Folsom wrote:
> If your backups are slow, it seems that 2GB of RAM might be insufficient for
> rsync to perform optimally.
>
>
> On Mon, Nov 5, 2012 at 1:
On 5 Nov 2012, at 20:15, Richard Shaw wrote:
>
>
> Both are connected to the same switch at the data centre using gigabit
> interfaces.
>
> This yields:
>
> Backup size: 105.58 Gb (yep, it is quite big)
> Speed: 0.29 Mb/s
>
> I believe the above is horrifically slow, but would welcome your
