wrote on 04/26/2013 06:27:32 PM:
> My point is that even with o(100) files/copies which assuming you are
> backing up multiple versions means you have far fewer distinct files
> -- you may be better off just writing a script...
I get your point, though I would ask you to define "better"...
> Ba
On Fri, Apr 26, 2013 at 5:31 PM, wrote:
> >
> Precisely... if you just have a few (as in o(100)) large database
> files then you don't need all the complexity of BackupPC which comes
> at the cost of speed, etc. And the pooling part which is perhaps the
> main differentiator of BackupPC probably
Les Mikesell wrote at about 16:29:10 -0500 on Friday, April 26, 2013:
> On Fri, Apr 26, 2013 at 3:46 PM, Lord Sporkton
> wrote:
> > As mentioned we have multiple customers and departments. It's not just one
> > server. Also 50g data bases aren't the largest. We have ones upto 200g
> > indivi
Timothy J Massey wrote at about 17:20:13 -0400 on Friday, April 26, 2013:
> wrote on 04/26/2013 05:04:07 PM:
>
> > If you are indeed talking about files in the 50-200GB range, you are
> > not going to fit more than a handful of files per TB disk... even if
> > you have a RAID array of multip
On Fri, Apr 26, 2013 at 3:46 PM, Lord Sporkton wrote:
> As mentioned we have multiple customers and departments. It's not just one
> server. Also 50g data bases aren't the largest. We have ones upto 200g
> individual dbs. Also we're using scsi drives which cost a pretty penny.
I think you are mis
wrote on 04/26/2013 05:04:07 PM:
> If you are indeed talking about files in the 50-200GB range, you are
> not going to fit more than a handful of files per TB disk... even if
> you have a RAID array of multiple disks, you are still probably
> talking about only a small number of files. So, you ar
Lord Sporkton wrote at about 13:46:25 -0700 on Friday, April 26, 2013:
> As mentioned we have multiple customers and departments. It's not just one
> server. Also 50g data bases aren't the largest. We have ones upto 200g
> individual dbs. Also we're using scsi drives which cost a pretty penny.
As mentioned we have multiple customers and departments. It's not just one
server. Also 50g data bases aren't the largest. We have ones upto 200g
individual dbs. Also we're using scsi drives which cost a pretty penny.
On Apr 26, 2013 1:31 PM, "Arnold Krille" wrote:
> On Thu, 25 Apr 2013 14:45:50
Arnold Krille wrote on 04/26/2013 04:27:44 PM:
> On Thu, 25 Apr 2013 14:45:50 -0700 Lord Sporkton
> wrote:
> > I'm currently backing up mysql by way of dumping the DB to a flat
> > file then backing up the flat file. Which works well in most cases
> > except when someone has a database that is b
On Thu, 25 Apr 2013 14:45:50 -0700 Lord Sporkton
wrote:
> I'm currently backing up mysql by way of dumping the DB to a flat
> file then backing up the flat file. Which works well in most cases
> except when someone has a database that is bigger than 50% of the
> hdd. Or really bigger than around s
10 matches
Mail list logo
