Am Thu, 13 Mar 2014 19:19:22 +0100
schrieb Marco :
> username = administrator
> password = XXX
> domain = example.com
>
> Is that not enough to ensure I connect as domain admin?
On Windows users can (and by default do) lock out the Administrator
from seeing their files without extra work. Tru
Hi.
I'm grateful for the input already, thanks!
Any opinions on these points too? :)
- If we will start testing BackupPC, shall we start with 4.0 (even
though it's alpha), so that we wouldn't have any migration pains afterwards?
- Does 4.0 have client-side deduplication? From documentation it
Am 13.03.2014 18:19, schrieb Les Mikesell:
> There is seldom a reason to _not_ stay up to date with a CentOS
> system. All it takes is an occassional 'yum update' and the updates
> within the long life of a major release number are pretty well vetted
> to not break anything.
Funny that you menti
2014-03-13 18:42 GMT+01:00 Holger Parplies :
> Hi,
>
> Marco wrote on 2014-03-13 12:25:03 +0100 [[BackupPC-users] Strange SMB
> errors]:
> > I'm using BackupPC to back up a windows server 2008 R2 machine using smb.
> > [...]
> > The problem I'm having is [...] with a normal directory. This directo
Hi,
Marco wrote on 2014-03-13 12:25:03 +0100 [[BackupPC-users] Strange SMB errors]:
> I'm using BackupPC to back up a windows server 2008 R2 machine using smb.
> [...]
> The problem I'm having is [...] with a normal directory. This directory is
> not being backed up, and in the xfer log I see:
>
On Thu, Mar 13, 2014 at 7:56 AM, Markus wrote:
> Am 13.03.2014 13:01, schrieb kpolberg:
>> You might have hit this "bug"
>> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=845233
>
> Wow, thanks! Ok, time to update...
There is seldom a reason to _not_ stay up to date with a CentOS
system. All it tak
Markus wrote at about 12:21:55 +0100 on Thursday, March 13, 2014:
> Hi list,
>
> I think I found a bug with the pc/backups "state" files, or with file
> locking or something like that, not sure what the correct terminology
> is. I'm running BackupPC-3.2.1-7.el6.x86_64 on CentOS release 6.2
Why not reboot the BackupPC box periodically to avoid the "Out of
Memory" error? Liek monthly via a cron job. A FS not being closed
gracefully (Like during shutrdown/Reboot) will give issues sooner or
later. What FS are you using on the iSCSI Volume?
It isn't necessarily BackupPC's fault.
--
Am 13.03.2014 13:01, schrieb kpolberg:
> You might have hit this "bug"
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=845233
Wow, thanks! Ok, time to update...
--
Learn Graph Databases - Download FREE O'Reilly Book
"Gra
On 03/13/2014 12:21 PM, Markus wrote:
> Hi list,
>
> I think I found a bug with the pc/backups "state" files, or with file
> locking or something like that, not sure what the correct terminology
> is. I'm running BackupPC-3.2.1-7.el6.x86_64 on CentOS release 6.2
> (Final) 64bit.
>
> Here's what hap
Hi list,
I think I found a bug with the pc/backups "state" files, or with file
locking or something like that, not sure what the correct terminology
is. I'm running BackupPC-3.2.1-7.el6.x86_64 on CentOS release 6.2
(Final) 64bit.
Here's what happened:
1. Every now and then, like every 4 or 5
I'm using BackupPC to back up a windows server 2008 R2 machine using smb.
I'm aware that junction points give errors during the backup as in
NT_STATUS_ACCESS_DENIED listing \Documents and Settings\*
but I'm fine with that. The problem I'm having is not about a junction
point, but with a normal di
Hi Josh,
Why not just export your local folders that need to be backed up via
rsync daemon? Much easier in the long run.
Also I presume you are backing up /etc to back up the system config, bad
idea to do that to backuppc if you are doing it for DR purposes. rather
have a cronjob (rsync :)) backu
13 matches
Mail list logo
