Hello Kris, thanks for the answer.
What the best practice for this?
Em 20/05/2016 8:15 PM, "Kris Lou" escreveu:
> You want to change the location of the TopDir (it's in the main server
> config) to mounted nfs path.
>
> While this will work, you will probably not get same performance as
> locall
You want to change the location of the TopDir (it's in the main server
config) to mounted nfs path.
While this will work, you will probably not get same performance as locally
mounted filesystems.
Kris Lou
k...@themusiclink.net
On Fri, May 20, 2016 at 2:38 PM, Elias Pereira wrote:
> Hello guy
Hello guys,
First of all I want to thank everyone involved with the continuation of
backuppc. And sorry for my bad english. :(
- I installed FreeNAS server and I create a nfs share for the backuppc;
- On the backuppc server I mount that nsf share found in /mnt/storage path.
My doubt. How to conf
All,
On 20.05.2016 20:22, David Cramblett wrote:
> I think it's more the general idea of this situation is common. My
> employer uses BackupPC as well, and much of my work would be on company
> time - although I work for a government agency. So not necessarily
> singling you out, just the situation
I think it's more the general idea of this situation is common. My employer
uses BackupPC as well, and much of my work would be on company time -
although I work for a government agency. So not necessarily singling you
out, just the situation your in. I think it's a common situation.
David
On Fri
Wow! I'm totally surprised by how much discussion my possible
contributions (because they would be on work time) have launched!
Is anyone in a position to discuss this with representatives of my
employer? Just a discussion of discovery for both sides...
Thanks!
-Rich
Exactly. Nothing you can do to prevent baseless lawsuits, only make the
case against them harder and hopefully not worth the financial risk.
SCO is probably the best example of the worst case scenario from a
financial perspective. As you say, BackupPC doesn't have a value that would
make it worthw
On 05/20 01:18 , Stefan Peter wrote:
> The worst that can happen is that the new copyright holder wants to
> retrieve his contribution. So you remove the individuals code and
> replace it with independent, fresh code from another contributor. But I
> have never heard of an event like this and I'm n
Yeah, nothing I've suggested was in regards to recommending a license
change. That's the exact thing I would want to avoid. The goal from my
perspective is to protect all the work Craig has done, while allowing for
outside contributions without fear that someone could do something evil
down the roa
