Changing to an NFS mount point isn't any different from the docs that
detail how to change the mount point in general. Create your mount point,
Mount the NFS share, the change /var/lib/backuppc to a softlink to where
ever your new backuppc location is.
(Those the 10,000 foot view. You'll want to
On 08/05 02:05 , john boris wrote:
> I searched the archives for using a Synology but haven't found the answer.
> I have a Synology RS815 that I want to use as my storage unit while running
> Backuppc on aanother LINUX Server. Since all of the data, logs and config
> files are in /var/lib/backuppc
It's not hard. Symlink your pool (commonly /var/lib/BackupPC) to your
mounted NFS path (or change the TopDir). I did it this way for a few years.
That being said (and with the repeated statements of "storage is cheap"), I
never exceeded 3-4 MBps on a backup run. In the end, it was better to
I searched the archives for using a Synology but haven't found the answer.
I have a Synology RS815 that I want to use as my storage unit while running
Backuppc on aanother LINUX Server. Since all of the data, logs and config
files are in /var/lib/backuppc on the server running backuppc how does on
Thanks Adam for your patience and insights! And everyone else for
putting up with me! ;)
also sprach Adam Goryachev [2016-08-05
01:12 +0200]:
> > But instead of (what seems to be) chunk-wise checksum transmission,
> > why don't we (also) store the whole-file
also sprach Adam Goryachev [2016-08-05
01:31 +0200]:
> Maybe try this:
> tail -f -n +0 blah.log | /usr/share/backuppc/bin/BackupPC_zcat -
> You need to include the beginning of the file or else it won't
> detect the compression header Also, the -
also sprach Adam Goryachev [2016-08-05
01:08 +0200]:
> > Why aren't we just using standard gzip or bzip2 or xz, for which
> > decompressors exist on pretty much every Unix system?
> I'm pretty sure there is a backuppc package for debian :)
Oh yes, sure, but
also sprach Adam Goryachev [2016-08-05
01:04 +0200]:
> We do update a partial backup, as long as the new partial contains
> more files than the previous partial, but it doesn't even save
> a partially transferred file.
I think this is fine, and a partially