On Wed, Feb 8, 2017 at 8:30 PM, Scott Walker
wrote:
> Infra is not really a concern for me, it's more will the software handle it.
There aren't really any limits in the software. Just some
inefficiency in the perl implementation of rsync in v3. I don't have
any experience with v4. I'd expect
We all know that rsync's weakness is very large file sets. They have to be
held in memory on both client and server to determine the change set to be
transmitted. So it's reasonable to want to be able to break up a large
backup client into multiple backup jobs by splitting subdirectories into
t
Infra is not really a concern for me, it's more will the software handle it.
Network connectivity and IOPs aren't a huge concern (machines will be
speced to be "beasts" as well as network.
de-dupe for me is not a massive want. 99.9% of the files we will be backing
up are 100% unique. I'd rather s
On Wed, Feb 8, 2017 at 8:24 PM, Scott Walker
wrote:
> Individual files range from k text files, to100GB+ in size. Everything from
> images to movies files, to text, to VM images. (We are a VFX studio).
>
> And mainly unique files. so deduplication I'm not honestly concerned about.
> I just like Ba
Yeah I'm not super concerned personally with the UI but the UI is for
pointy haired types to be able to do things. (yeah I know).
On 8 February 2017 at 21:39, Kenneth Porter wrote:
> Deduplication and rsync are the big reasons I went with BackupPC. UI is way
> down the list for me. I can learn
--On Wednesday, February 08, 2017 9:24 PM -0500 Scott Walker
wrote:
> And mainly unique files. so deduplication I'm not honestly concerned
> about. I just like BackupPC UI and it's easy of use and I'm wondering if
> this is a possible fit.
Deduplication and rsync are the big reasons I went with
Individual files range from k text files, to100GB+ in size. Everything from
images to movies files, to text, to VM images. (We are a VFX studio).
And mainly unique files. so deduplication I'm not honestly concerned about.
I just like BackupPC UI and it's easy of use and I'm wondering if this is a
On 09/02/17 09:52, Scott Walker wrote:
> Has anyone used BackupPC in an enterprise environment?
>
> I'm talking PBs of data, 100's of servers, hybrid environment. Mac,
> Solaris, BSD, Linux, Windows.
>
> Did it work well? Any gotcha's? When you see PB of data does it make
> your gut feeling go uh
On 2/8/2017 2:52 PM, Scott Walker wrote:
> I'm talking PBs of data, 100's of servers, hybrid environment. Mac,
> Solaris, BSD, Linux, Windows.
How big are the individual files? How much duplication? A big feature
of BPC is the post-backup de-duplication that reduces the amount of
backup medium
On Wed, Feb 8, 2017 at 4:26 PM, Edith Cloutier
wrote:
> fév 06 07:57:34 edithbureau backuppc[17175]: 2017-02-06 07:57:34 Can't
> create a test hardlink between a file in /var/lib/backuppc/pc and
> /var/lib/backuppc/cpool. Either these are different file syste
Something wrong with permissions...
Has anyone used BackupPC in an enterprise environment?
I'm talking PBs of data, 100's of servers, hybrid environment. Mac,
Solaris, BSD, Linux, Windows.
Did it work well? Any gotcha's? When you see PB of data does it make your
gut feeling go uhh yeah no.
I'm just fact finding and investigating.
Thanks Jan for your answer.
The command ""systemctl status backuppc.service" give this :
< ● backuppc.service - LSB: Launch backuppc server
Loaded: loaded (/etc/init.d/backuppc; bad; vendor preset: enabled)
Active: failed (Result: exit-code) since lun 2017-02-06 07:57:34
EST; 17s ago
12 matches
Mail list logo
