On Fri, 21 Jul 2017 13:12:25 -0500
Les Mikesell wrote:
> There is a missing piece in terms of recreating the
> partitions/filesystems/raids to match the system you want to recreate,
OMFG, ZE missing link ? ;-p)
> unless you have already automated that with tuned kickstart files or
> all of your
On Fri, Jul 21, 2017 at 12:32 PM, B wrote:
>
>> You might also want
>> a image copy on a remote server, which is yet another different
>> requirement.
>
> I guess you mean for total reconstruction (?)
> At this time I did not found any significant gain of time between image
> (which, BTW, take
On Sat, 22 Jul 2017 02:40:57 +1000
Adam Goryachev wrote:
> I think you want both snapshots on the local server, as well as BPC on
> a remote server. They each serve a different need.
Hmm, I'm not that sure; for the time being, snapshots will be kept and
doubled w/ other BPC servers for daily "sn
On Fri, Jul 21, 2017 at 11:40 AM, Adam Goryachev
wrote:
>
> I think you want both snapshots on the local server, as well as BPC on a
> remote server. They each serve a different need. You might also want a image
> copy on a remote server, which is yet another different requirement.
>
On the image
On 22/7/17 01:38, B wrote:
On Fri, 21 Jul 2017 09:27:41 -0500
Les Mikesell wrote:
The quick fix here is to use a Mac with an external or network drive
for time machine. If you aren't familiar with it, it does exactly
Among many other, Apple products are to stay out of the company.
wh
On Fri, 21 Jul 2017 09:27:41 -0500
Les Mikesell wrote:
> The quick fix here is to use a Mac with an external or network drive
> for time machine. If you aren't familiar with it, it does exactly
Among many other, Apple products are to stay out of the company.
> what you suggested with easy acce
Les-
Putting the Mac vs (anything else) argument aside, as it detracts from the
discussion, I would like to add that even low end NAS devices like the
QNAP offer filesystem snapshots that are, for the purposes of a home office
or small business seamless. At $WORK, I've used NetApp, EMC Isilon,
On Fri, Jul 21, 2017 at 8:59 AM, B wrote:
>
> @GW Haywood: this would be limited to executive people that usually know
> what they're doing and are the only ones that are working on not-to-lose
> docs ie: big spreadsheets - the idea is to entirely pull off any admin
> from the restoration pro
On Fri, 21 Jul 2017 06:29:46 -0700
Kenneth Porter wrote:
> A better solution would be a change to rsyncd to monitor its
> filesystem and remember which files were touched since the last
> backup.
Yep, this is much closer to what I imagined.
> Some filesystems have a "backdoor" like inotify that
--On Thursday, July 20, 2017 3:54 AM +0200 B wrote:
An addition to BPC could do the trick, preferably saving the result in
another directory than the main one, by checking which files have been
touched the present day and save them automatically; it may be triggered
from a crontab. And befo
Hi there,
On Thu, 20 Jul 2017, B wrote:
... clumsy users would be able to recover their work very rapidly
with at most one hour loss ...
How about that ?
You want to apply a technical answer to a non-technical question.
Bad idea.
It is vastly more expensive to employ highly trained peo
11 matches
Mail list logo
