On Thu, 19 Apr 2018 16:55:59 + (UTC)
Michael Stowe wrote:
> While there's nothing inherently wrong with selecting an older
> filesystem, ext4's design decision of backward compatibility has
> essentially set some of its limitations in stone. (Your article below
> elaborates on this point;
On 2018-04-19 06:31, G.W. Haywood via BackupPC-users wrote:
Hi there,
On Thu, 19 Apr 2018, Michael Stowe wrote:
... Those who do reach back a decade or more to select a filesystem,
That's like saying the Linux kernel is a hangover from the end of the
20th century. It's misleading, and more
On 2018-04-19 07:37, Gerald Brandt wrote:
I've had data loss on XFS, so I'm very wary of it. It used to be my go
to filesystem.
Lately, I've been looking at bcachefs2. Anyone experience using it?
Gerald
I've also had data loss on XFS, for which I have no satisfactory
explanation, but I'm equ
I've had data loss on XFS, so I'm very wary of it. It used to be my go
to filesystem.
Lately, I've been looking at bcachefs2. Anyone experience using it?
Gerald
On 2018-04-18 05:21 PM, Michael Stowe wrote:
On 2018-04-18 04:25, f...@igh.de wrote:
Dear List,
running BackupPC v4 I s
Hi there,
On Thu, 19 Apr 2018, Michael Stowe wrote:
... Those who do reach back a decade or more to select a filesystem,
That's like saying the Linux kernel is a hangover from the end of the
20th century. It's misleading, and more than a bit unfair especially
considering the numbers of posts
